Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec;63(12):1925–1932. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263501

TABLE 3.

Results of the Univariate Analyses for PFS and OS Using Time-Dependent AUC Analysis and Cox Models (HR)

3D 18F-FDG PET/CT estimates 2D PET MIP estimates
Data PFS/OS Metrics TMTV Dmax sTMTV sDmax
REMARC PFS AUC 0.67 (0.60–0.73) 0.65 (0.58–0.72) 0.65 (0.58–0.72) 0.68 (0.62–0.75)
HR 11.24 (2.10–46.20) 9.0 (2.53–23.63) 11.81 (3.29–31.77) 12.49 (3.42–34.50)
OS AUC 0.67 (0.58–0.76) 0.62 (0.53–0.71) 0.67 (0.58–0.76) 0.68 (0.59–0.76)
HR 16.43 (2.42–77.29) 8.60 (1.47–28.33) 22.14 (4.73–69.06) 22.79 (3.80–79.21)
LNH073B PFS AUC 0.62 (0.49–0.75) 0.56 (0.39–0.72) 0.66 (0.53–0.80) 0.58 (0.41–0.74)
HR 13.79 (0.45–86.80) 32.83 (0.4–220.8) 9.24 (0.95–37.94) 16.79 (0.69–86.41)
OS AUC 0.65 (0.46–0.82) 0.51 (0.31–0.72) 0.64 (0.45–0.82) 0.50 (0.29–0.72)
HR 64.30 (0.74–384.80) 49.21 (0.07–258.3) 14.17 (0.59–67.02) 20.39 (0.08–93.66)