Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov;43(11):1582–1588. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7667

Table 2:

Comparison of measurements of the STA between participants with good and poor collateral formation

Patients with MMD, Mean (SD) or No. (%)
P
Good Collateral Formation (n = 23) Poor Collateral Formation (n = 22)
Morphologic features of ipsilateral STA
 Cross-sectional area (mm2) 0.10 (SD, 0.03) 0.09 (SD, 0.02) .258
 Straightness 11 (48%) 13 (59%) .449
 High bifurcation position 10 (43%) 10 (46%) .894
Morphologic features of contralateral STA
 Cross-sectional area (mm2) 0.11 (SD, 0.02) 0.12 (SD, 0.04) .095
 Straightness 12 (52%) 2 (55%) .873
 High bifurcation position 14 (61%) 9 (41%) .181
PC-MR imaging of ipsilateral STA
 Vmean (cm/s) 6.69 (SD, 2.02) 5.30 (SD, 1.41) .011
 Vpeak (cm/s) 22.62 (SD, 5.79) 17.00 (SD, 6.62) .004
 BVF (mL/s) 0.70 (SD, 0.32) 0.50 (SD, 0.17) .013
PC-MR imaging of contralateral STA
 Vmean (cm/s) 7.08 (SD, 2.92) 6.03 (SD, 1.53) .141
 Vpeak (cm/s) 23.06 (SD, 6.37) 18.75 (SD, 6.07) .025
 BVF (mL/s) 0.74 (SD, 0.35) 0.61 (SD, 0.26) .166

Note:—Ipsilateral STA indicates superficial temporal artery on the operative side; Contralateral STA, superficial temporal artery on the nonoperative side.