Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov;43(11):1582–1588. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7667

Table 4:

Comparison of PC-MR imaging of STA between participants with improved mRS and those with poor response

Patients with MMD, Mean (SD) or No. (%)
P
Improved mRS (n = 24) Poor Response mRS (n = 21)
PC-MR imaging of ipsilateral STA
 Vmean (cm/s) 6.43 (SD, 1.91) 5.53 (SD, 1.73) .106
 Vpeak (cm/s) 22.13 (SD, 6.59) 17.30 (SD, 6.13) .015
 BVF (mL/s) 0.65 (SD, 0.30) 0.55 (SD, 0.24) .268
PC-MR imaging of contralateral STA
 Vmean (cm/s) 6.92 (SD, 2.37) 6.15 (SD, 2.50) .295
 Vpeak (cm/s) 21.97 (SD, 6.60) 19.79 (SD, 6.22) .263
 BVF (mL/s) 0.71 (SD, 0.28) 0.64 (SD, 0.34) .453