Table 5.
Frequency and proportion of shifts within one process.
| Types of process shift | Volume I | Volume II | Volume III | Total | Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shifts within MAP | 17 | 17 | 17 | 51 | 68.00% |
| Creative < >atransformative | 5 | 5 | 4 | ||
| Shifts within transformative subtype | 12 | 12 | 12 | ||
| Shifts within creative subtype | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Shifts within MEP | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 10.67% |
| Like < >please | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Emotive < >perceptive | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Cognitive < >perceptive | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Shifts within RP | 6 | 8 | 1 | 15 | 20.00% |
| Circumstantial < >possessive | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Intensive < >possessive | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Intensive < >circumstantial | 2 | 3 | 1 | ||
| Shifts within intensive subtype: identifying < >attributive | 1 | 4 | 0 | ||
| Shifts within BP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Shifts within EP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Shifts within VP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.33% |
| Indicating>imperating | 1 | 0 | 0 |
a“ < >” means that two subtypes of one process type transform mutually.