Table 4.
Between group effect sizes of user activity. Left: Comparison between the control group (n = 80) and the intervention group divided into the low usage groups (0–79% and 30–79%), and the high usage group (80–100%). Right: Comparisons between high usage (80–100%) and the low usage groups (0–79% and 30–79%).
| Control group (n = 80) vs. Intervention use categories |
High usage group (80–100%, n = 35) vs. lower usage categories |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–79% (n = 36) | 30–79% (n = 29) | 80–100% (n = 35) | 0–79% (n = 36) | 30–79% (n = 29) | |
| CompACT Total | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| CompACT VA | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.12 | −0.09 |
| CompACT BA | 0.04 | −0.08 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| CompACT OE | −0.20a | −0.17a | 0.38 | 0.62 | 0.58 |
| SelfComp (SCS) | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
CompACT Total = Comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes.
CompACT VA = CompACT Valued action.
CompACT BA = CompACT Behavioral Awareness.
CompACT OE = Comp ACT Openess to Experiences.
Self-Compassion = The Self-Compassion Scale–Short form (SCS-SF).
a
= change larger in the control group.