Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;13:1024606. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1024606

Table 2.

Soil organic carbon (% by mass), bulk density (g cm-3), and total C (Mg ha-1) in Fresno County and Napa County.

Factors and treatment Fresno County (Five points) Napa County (Oakville)
Average SOC (% mass) p-value a Bulk density (g cm-3) p-value C (t ha-1) p-value Average SOC (% mass) p-value Bulk density (g cm-3) p-value C (t ha-1) p-value
Tillage system (T)
NT 0.70 ns 1.4 ns 14.68 ns 1.44 a ** 1.3 ns 28.15 a **
CT 0.69 1.4 14.39 1.37 b 1.3 26.62 b
Cover crop (CC)
AG 0.88 ns 1.4 ns 18.56 ns 1.47 ns 1.3 ns 28.67 ns
RV 0.90 1.4 18.93 1.45 1.3 28.33
PG 0.86 1.4 17.99 1.41 1.3 27.55
Depth (D)
0–15 cm 0.88 a *** 1.4 ns 18.50 a *** 1.45 a ** 1.3 ns 28.18 a **
15–30 cm 0.50 b 1.4 10.57 b 1.36 b 1.3 26.59 b
Year (Y)
2020 0.64 ns 1.4 ns 13.42 ns 1.30 ns 1.3 ns 25.37 ns
2021 0.69 1.4 14.53 1.40 1.3 27.29
CC × T -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns
CC × T × D -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns
CC × T × D × Y -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns -- ns

a ANOVA was used to compare data (p-value indicated). Letters within columns indicate significant mean separation according to Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test (at p = 0.05), where *: p-value < 0.05; **: p-value < 0.001, and ***: p-value < 0.0001. b NT, no tillage; CT, conventional tillage; AG, annual grass; RV, residual vegetation; PG, perennial grass; SOC, soil organic carbon; ns, not significant; and --, not applicable.