Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 30;42(48):9053–9068. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0708-22.2022

Table 1.

Patient informationa

ID Age (yr) Sex nElec (vis) Implant Data collected Notes
1 19 F 203 (21) R G/S/D 2S, 2R R2 mem data not usable (D)
2 26 F 163 (59) L G/S/D 2S, 2R
3 43 F 172 (10) Bi D 1S, 2R
4 61 F 136 (0) Bi D 1S, 1R neural mem data not usable (T)
5 31 M 152 (31) L G/S/D 2S, 2R R1 encoding data not usable (T)
6 69 F 92 (7) L D 2S, 2R
7 33 M 232 (22) Bi D 1S, 1R
8 31 F 192 (20) Bi D 2S, 2R no mem data collected (C)
9 56 F 192 (36) Bi D 2S, 2R R1 encoding data not usable (T)
10 53 M 148 (0) Bi D 2S, 2R

aDescription of patient participation. nElec (vis), the total number of electrode contacts, followed by the number of visual electrode contacts. Implant: R, right-sided implant; L, left-sided implant; Bi, bilateral implant; G, grid; S, strip; D, depth. Data collected: the number of runs for each condition collected (S, Structured; R, Random). Notes: which runs (if any) were excluded from given analyses and why: D, patient distraction (e.g., a clinician coming in and disrupting testing); T, trigger issue (i.e., an error with the equipment such that we could not align individual trials to our neural signal); C, computer error (e.g., the computer crashed).