Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 8;15:173. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01391-4

Table 1.

Comparison of three-generation EGFR-TKIs

Representative drugs Types of inhibitors Targets of EGFR ORR
(%)
PFS (months) OS (months) Ref
First-generation EGFR- TKIs
 Gefitinib Reversible Ex19del, L858R 67–74 9.2–11.9 30.5–38.8 [5, 6]
 Erlotinib Reversible Ex19del, L858R 64 9.7–13.1 19.3 [34, 35]
 Icotinib Reversible Ex19del, L858R / 11.2 30.5 [36, 37]
Second-generation EGFR-TKIs
 Afatinib Irreversible Ex19del, L858R 70 11.0–13.6

19.6–27.6*

30.7–33.3*

[7, 39, 41, 42]
 Dacomitinib Irreversible Ex19del, L858R 75 14.7 34.1 [8, 44]
Third-generation EGFR- TKIs
 Osimertinib Irreversible

Ex19del, L858R

T790M

80 18.9 38.6 [22, 46]
 Aumolertinib Irreversible

Ex19del, L858R

T790M

74 19.3 NR [47]
 Furmonertinib Irreversible

Ex19del, L858R

T790M

74 20.8 NR [48, 243]
 Lazertinib Irreversible

Ex19del, L858R

T790M

55 11.1 NR [244, 245]

EGFR-TKIs epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, wt wild type, ORR objective response rate, PFS progression-free survival, OS overall survival, NR not reached

*The upper data was derived from patients with L858R and the lower data was derived from patients with Ex19del. All exhibited data were derived from clinical trials in which drug as monotherapy in the first-line setting