Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;22:296. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02715-7

Table 2.

Influences of different treatments (FP: farmer conventional fertilization control; BM: bone meal application control; X2: bacteria agent X2; X3: bacteria agent X3; X21: bacteria agent X21) to wheat yield components. Data are shown as Mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters indicate significance among different treatments at the 5% level

Treatments Aboveground biomass(kg hm−1) Spike number (× 105 hm−1) Grain number per spike 1000-grain weights (g) Yield(kg hm−1) Yield increase rate (%)
FP 8213.98 ± 327.85b 28.30 ± 1.11c 35.74 ± 0.30a 40.22 ± 1.44c 5648.50 ± 90.15b 0
BM 8663.97 ± 327.49b 30.37 ± 1.40c 35.98 ± 1.24a 41.54 ± 0.81c 5695.64 ± 72.67b 0.83
X2 14,466.32 ± 1799.52a 44.00 ± 1.66b 36.17 ± 0.22a 44.42 ± 0.60b 6279.82 ± 103.35a 11.18
X3 16,350.46 ± 1425.65a 47.47 ± 1.96a 37.19 ± 1.55a 48.30 ± 1.84a 6463.17 ± 187.35a 14.42
X21 14,973.23 ± 1432.44a 45.57 ± 1.37ab 36.46 ± 0.49a 46.65 ± 1.24ab 6394.63 ± 159.27a 13.21