Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;21:377. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04397-y

Table 1.

Comparison of mean number of female and male Anopheles funestus, Anopheles gambiae Complex and Culex species collected indoors and outdoors by aspiration between screened and unscreened houses

Collection location Category Mosquito species Intervention status Mosquito numbers Mean (95% CI) RR (95% CI) P-value
Indoors Female Anopheles funestus Screened 219 0.47 (0.34–0.60) 0.40 (0.29–0.55) < 0.001
Unscreened 593 1.34 (0.94–1.74) Ref
Anopheles gambiae Screened 202 0.43 (0.31–0.56) 0.46 (0.34–0.62) < 0.001
Unscreened 403 0.91 (0.72–1.10) Ref
Culex species Screened 4256 9.13 (7.55–10.72) 0.53 (0.45–0.61) < 0.001
Unscreened 7128 16.09 (13.80–18.38) Ref
Male Anopheles funestus Screened 260 0.56 (0.28–0.84) 0.37 (0.26–0.53) < 0.001
Unscreened 478 1.08 (0.82–1.34) Ref
Anopheles gambiae Screened 175 0.38 (0.21–0.54) 0.40 (0.28–0.57) < 0.001
Unscreened 341 0.77 (0.59–0.95) Ref
Culex species Screened 4573 9.81 (7.67–11.95) 0.36 (0.30–0.43) < 0.001
Unscreened 10,265 23.17 (19.70–26.65) Ref
Outdoors Female Anopheles funestus Screened 123 0.27 (0.18–0.35) 1.08 (0.72–1.63) 0.70
Unscreened 105 0.24 (0.12–0.37) Ref
Anopheles gambiae Screened 418 0.91 (0.72–1.09) 1.23 (0.94–1.62) 0.13
Unscreened 347 0.80 (0.58–1.02) Ref
Culex species Screened 1867 4.05 (3.40–4.69) 1.11 (0.90–1.37) 0.33
Unscreened 1438 3.31 (2.77–3.86) Ref
Male Anopheles funestus Screened 204 0.44 (0.29–0.60) 1.59 (1.00–2.53) 0.05
Unscreened 90 0.21 (0.14–0.28) Ref
Anopheles gambiae Screened 308 0.67 (0.51–0.82) 1.09 (0.79–1.51) 0.58
Unscreened 301 0.69 (0.49–0.89) Ref
Culex species Screened 2196 4.76 (4.00–5.53) 1.10 (0.87–1.39) 0.42
Unscreened 1712 3.94 (3.26–4.63) Ref