Table 2.
DM (n = 668) |
MetS (n = 1122) |
Neither DM/MetS (n = 2028) |
p value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAC volume (95%CI) | Overall | 79.46 (71.97–87.72)§ | 60.53 (55.46–66.08)‡ | 51.77 (48.01–55.82) | < 0.0001 |
Non-statin users | 72.17 (64.44–80.81)§ | 56.58 (51.72–61.89)* | 48.61 (45.16–52.32) | < 0.0001 | |
Statin users | 98.12 (80.60-119.44)§ | 69.32 (56.62–84.88) | 57.24 (47.59–68.85) | < 0.0001 | |
CAC density (95%CI) | Overall | 2.54 (2.49–2.59)§ | 2.61 (2.57–2.65)‡ | 2.69 (2.65–2.72) | < 0.0001 |
Non-statin users | 2.56 (2.51–2.62)§ | 2.62 (2.57–2.66)† | 2.68 (2.65–2.72) | 0.0001 | |
Statin users | 2.53 (2.44–2.62)§ | 2.65 (2.55–2.74)* | 2.76 (2.67–2.84) | < 0.0001 |
The mean CAC density (or ln(Volume)) was adjusted for ln(Volume) (or CAC density), age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, smoking status, statin use and hypertension medication
P values were calculated from ANOVA test among three groups (last column) and from student t-tests comparing DM vs. neither DM/MetS and MetS versus neither DM/MetS (presented as symbols)
CAC Coronary artery calcium, DM Diabetes mellitus, MetS Metabolic syndrome
*p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡ p< 0.001, §p < 0.0001.