Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;22:467. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02998-3

Table 4.

Associations between plasma NfL and clinical and laboratory variables in 72 SLE patients

n (%) β 95% CI p-value
Renal involvement according to SLICC SLE Classification Criteria 29 (40%) 0.069 0.001–0.14 0.047
Anti-dsDNA positive according to SLICC SLE Classification Criteria 44 (61%) 0.077 0.009–0.15 0.027
P-Creatinine 0.003 0.001–0.006 0.009
S-Complement factor 3 < 0.8 g/L 44 (61%) 0.072 0.005–0.14 0.031
S-Complement factor 4 < 0.16 g/L 52 (72%) −0.015 −0.092-0.061 0.69
SLICC/ACR-DI ≥1 25 (35%) 0.097 0.028–0.17 0.007
SLEDAI-2 K ≥1 45 (63%) 0.063 −0.006-0.13 0.075
SLEDAI-2 K ≥4 18 (25%) 0.023 −0.059-0.10 0.58
Ongoing treatment with glucocorticoids 57 (79%) 0.10 0.022–0.18 0.014
Ongoing treatment with non-antimalarial DMARDs 43 (60%) 0.091 0.025–0.16 0.008
Ongoing treatment with antihypertensives 22 (31%) 0.096 0.026–0.17 0.008

Linear regression models with plasma log-NfL concentrations as the dependent variable, all adjusted for age

NfL Neurofilament Light, n Number of subjects, β Unstandardized regression coefficient, 95% CI 95% confidence interval of β, SLICC Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics, Anti-dsDNA Anti-double stranded DNA IgG antibodies, P Plasma, S Serum, ACR American College of Rheumatology, SLEDAI-2 K SLE Disease Activity Index 2000, DMARD Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug