Table 2.
Linear/logistic regressions between WHO guidelines at baseline with MVPA and meeting WHO guidelines at follow-up
| Does meeting WHO guidelines at baseline predict MVPA at follow-up? | ||||||
| n | ß | B | 95% CI | Adj R2 | P | |
| Whole Sample a | 1886 | 8.3 | .13 | 5.4, 11.1 | .24 | < 0.001 |
| Stratified by Sex | ||||||
| Males b | 916 | 9.7 | .16 | 5.3, 14.1 | .20 | < 0.001 |
| Females b | 970 | 7.4 | .12 | 3.5, 11.3 | .24 | < 0.001 |
| Stratified by Sex and Pubertal status | ||||||
| Pre/Early Pubertal Males c | 399 | 10.8 | .17 | 3.4, 18.2 | .21 | 0.004 |
| Pubertal Males c | 473 | 6.9 | .12 | 1.1, 12.8 | .16 | 0.020 |
| Pre/Early Pubertal Females c | 419 | 14.6 | .24 | 9.1, 20.1 | .29 | < 0.001 |
| Pubertal Females c | 507 | −.26 | .00 | −6.1, 5.6 | .21 | 0.931 |
| Does meeting WHO guidelines at baseline predict meeting WHO guidelines at follow-up? | ||||||
| n | OR | 95% CI | R2 | P | ||
| Whole Sample a | 1886 | 2.2 | 1.5, 3.1 | .21 | < 0.001 | |
| Stratified by Sex | ||||||
| Males b | 916 | 2.6 | 1.5, 4.3 | .19 | < 0.001 | |
| Females b | 970 | 1.9 | 1.1, 3.4 | .20 | 0.027 | |
| Stratified by Sex and Pubertal status | ||||||
| Pre/Early Pubertal Males c | 399 | 3.8 | 1.6, 8.9 | .24 | 0.02 | |
| Pubertal Males c | 473 | 1.7 | .87, 3.5 | .17 | 0.118 | |
| Pre/Early Pubertal Females c | 419 | 5.0 | 2.2, 11.7 | .27 | < 0.001 | |
| Pubertal Females c | 507 | .61 | .23, 1.6 | .20 | 0.327 | |
ß Beta coefficient, B Standardized Beta coefficient, 95% CI 95% Confidence Interval, OR Odds Ratio
“No” is references category for Meeting WHO guidelines
a Models adjusted for Age, Sex, Country, ISCED, Income, BMI category, Gap, Pubertal Status, Valid Wear Time at T3
b Models adjusted for Age, Country, ISCED, Income, BMI category, Gap, Pubertal Status, Valid Wear Time at T3
c Models adjusted for Age, Country, ISCED, Income, BMI category, Gap, Valid Wear Time at T3