Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;22:538. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02975-1

Table 2.

Multivariate cox regression of the association between different RAR levels and in-hospital mortality

Outcomes Crude mode Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
 HR (95% CIs) P value HR (95% CIs) P value HR (95% CIs) P value HR (95% CIs) P value
RAR 1.05 (1.03 ~ 1.07) < 0.001 1.06 (1.04 ~ 1.07) < 0.001 1.05 (1.03 ~ 1.07) < 0.001 1.06 (1.03 ~ 1.08) < 0.001
Quintiles
Q1 (< 4.06) 1(Ref) 1(Ref) 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Q2 (4.06–4.89) 1.09 (0.87 ~ 1.36) 0.474 1.09 (0.87 ~ 1.36) 0.478 1.07 (0.85 ~ 1.34) 0.56 1.05 (0.83 ~ 1.33) 0.668
Q3 (4.89-6.0) 1.2 (0.96 ~ 1.49) 0.104 1.24 (1 ~ 1.55) 0.054 1.23 (0.98 ~ 1.53) 0.072 1.15 (0.91 ~ 1.46) 0.233
Q4 (≥ 6.0) 1.65 (1.35 ~ 2.03) < 0.001 1.76 (1.43 ~ 2.15) < 0.001 1.65 (1.34 ~ 2.04) < 0.001 1.52 (1.2 ~ 1,91) < 0.001
P for trend < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals

Crude model was adjusted for none

Model 1 was adjusted for age and gender

Model 2 was adjusted for model 1+ (MI, CHF, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, rheumatic disease, diabetes, renal disease, liver disease, MV, and RRT).

Model 3 was adjusted for model 1 + model 2+ (serum hematocrit, MBP, temperature, SPO2, potassium, INR, PT, and SOFA).

MI, myocardial infarction; CHF, congestive heart failure; MV, mechanical ventilation; RRT, renal replacement therapy; MBP, mean blood pressure; SPO2, percutaneous oxygen saturation; INR, international normalized ratio; PT, prothrombin time; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment