Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 5;33(6):110–120. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202205069

Table 2. Evaluation of the restorations according to FDI criteria used in this study.

Conventional resin (Filtek Z350 XT) Bulk-fill resin (Filtek TM Bulk Fill)
Baseline 6-month 1 year Baseline 6-month 1 year
Surface gloss (1/2/3/4/5) 40/30/0/0/0 33/34/0/0/0 17/33/1/0/0 46/24/0/0/0 37/29/0/0/0 25/26/0/0/0
Surface staining (1/2/3/4/5) 70/0/0/0/0 67/0/0/0/0 51/0/0/0/0 69/1/0/0/0 65/1/0/0/0 49/2/0/0/0
Marginal staining (1/2/3/4/5) 70/0/0/0/0 65/2/0/0/0 49/2/0/0/0 68/2/0/0/0 63/3/0/0/0 48/3/0/0/0
Anatomical form (1/2/3/4/5) 49/21/0/0/0 46/21/0/0/0 27/21/3/0/0 58/12/0/0/0 50/16/0/0/0 33/17/1/0/0
Fracture/ retention (1/2/3/4/5) 70/0/0/0/0 67/0/0/0/1 51/0/0/0/2 70/0/0/0/0 65/1/0/0/1 51/0/0/0/1
Marginal adaptation (1/2/3/4/5) 70/0/0/0/0 67/0/0/1/1 49/2/0/1/1 69/1/0/0/0 62/4/0/2/1 49/2/0/4/1
Recurrence of caries (1/2/3/4/5) 70/0/0/0/0 67/0/0/0/0 51/0/0/0/1 70/0/0/0/0 66/0/0/0/0 51/0/0/1/0

The numbers separated by slash represent the number of evaluated restorations that received the respective score: 1. clinically very good; 2. clinically good; 3. clinically satisfactory; 4. clinically unsatisfactory; 5. clinically poor