Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 8;10:tkac047. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkac047

Table 3.

Results from Chaganti et al.’s systematic review comparing traditional SSD with gauze and foam dressings for the treatment of second-degree thermal burns [19]

Trial Follow-up Percentage of patients with complete healing (RR) Time to complete healing
Silverstein et al. [35] 21 days post burn or until full reepithelization 1.2 [95%CI, 0.95–1.53] Mean days: 17 for SSD vs 13 for foam dressing (p > 0.05)
Tang et al. [33] 28 days post burn or until full reepithelization 1.0 [95%CI, 0.85–1.17] Median days: 15 for SSD vs 16 for foam dressing (p 0.74)
Yang et al. [34] 28 days post burn 1.0 [95% CI, 0.87–1.2] Mean days: 25 ± 4 SD for SSD vs 22 ± 3 SD (p < 0.05)

SSD silver sulfadiazine, CI confidence interval