Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Workplace Health Saf. 2022 Jan 11;70(2):97–119. doi: 10.1177/21650799211039439

Table 5.

Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool for Bias in Cross-Sectional Studies

No. Author (publishing year) (a) Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? (b) Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? (c) Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? (d) Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? (e) Were confounding factors identified? (f) Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? (g) Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? (h) Was appropriate analysis used?
23 McGann et al. (2015) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
24 Carr etal. (2016) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
25 Lindberg et al. (2018) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
26 Renaud etal. (2018) Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes

Note. Yes responses shaded in green.