Table 5.
Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool for Bias in Cross-Sectional Studies
No. | Author (publishing year) | (a) Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | (b) Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | (c) Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | (d) Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | (e) Were confounding factors identified? | (f) Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | (g) Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | (h) Was appropriate analysis used? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23 | McGann et al. (2015) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
24 | Carr etal. (2016) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
25 | Lindberg et al. (2018) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
26 | Renaud etal. (2018) | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Note. Yes responses shaded in green.