Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;24(12):2004–2014. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac136

Table 2.

Describing the current multimorbid AF management in Europe comparing university academic hospitals and non-academic hospitals

n = (%) Total sample University Hospital (198) Non-university hospital (143) P-value
Typical numbers of patients seen with AF per month
<20 47 (13.9) 22 (11.1) 25 (17.5)
20–50 169 (49.9) 102 (51.5) 68 (47.6)
51–100 87 (25.7) 56 (28.3) 31 (21.7) 0.20
101–150 19 (5.6) 9 (4.5) 11 (7.69)
>150 17 (5.0) 9 (4.5) 8 (5.59)
What specialized outpatient services are available at your centre?
Atrial fibrillation 174 (51.3) 107 (54.0) 67 (46.8) 0.19
Heart failure 249 (73.5) 145 (73.2) 102 (71.3) 0.70
Hypertension 134 (39.5) 82 (41.4) 52 (36.4) 0.33
Diabetes 177 (52.2) 107 (54.0) 70 (49.0) 0.35
Lipid 138 (40.7) 85 (42.9) 53 (37.1) 0.28
Anticoagulation 142 (41.9) 92 (46.5) 50 (35.0) 0.03*
Syncope 106 (31.3) 70 (35.4) 36 (25.2) 0.04*
Chest pain 146 (43.1) 95 (48.0) 58 (40.6) 0.03*
Palpitations/arrhythmia/resynchronization 148 (43.7) 93 (47.0) 53 (37.1) 0.07
Sleep apnoea 110 (32.4) 68 (34.3) 42 (29.4) 0.33
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (dementia, falls, frailty, etc.) 116 (34.2) 71 (36.0) 43 (30.1) 0.26
Other 17 (5.0) 6 (3.03) 13 (9.09) 0.03*
 Valvular heart disease clinic 2
 Cardio-oncology services 5
 Private health clinic 1
 Cardiogenetic services 3
 Cardiac rehabilitation services 2
 Cardiac disease in the young 1
 Pulmonology/pulmonary hypertension 2
 Stroke services 2
 Weight loss/Health promotion services 2
 Pacemaker service 1
 Post-COVID POTS 1
None—no specialized clinics available 19 (5.6)
What proportion of patients with comorbidities are referred to other specialty services?
>80% 7 (2.1) 3 (15.8) 4 (2.80)
61–80% 12 (3.5) 7 (3.54) 5 (3.50)
41–60% 55 (16.2) 32 (16.2) 23 (16.1) 0.80
20–40% 104 (30.7) 64 (32.3) 42 (29.4)
<19% 123 (36.3) 67 (33.8) 56 (39.2)
No response 38 (11.2)
What is the reason for this referral rate?
That is the number that needs referring 151 (44.5) 84 (42.4) 67 (46.9)
Resourcing issue so I need to be selective and prioritize 61 (18.0) 34 (17.2) 27 (18.9)
There is an established process with the relevant specialties 73 (21.5) 46 (23.2) 27 (18.9) 0.60
Other: 16 (4.7) 8 (4.04) 9 (6.29)
 Referral to GP for onwards referral to specialist services 4
 Patients don’t want onwards referral (time, money, access) 1
 Palliative Care/End of Life Care needs 1
 Availability of services 1
 Complexity 2
 Need for hospitalization 1
 Scope of Practice of non-medical providers 1
No response 38 (11.2)
What are the barriers within your current practice which potentially impacts on patient outcomes?
Lack of integrated model of care for complex patients with AF 174 (51.3) 115 (58.0) 60 (42.0) 0.003*
Lack of evidence-based guidelines 41 (12.1) 23 (11.6) 18 (12.6) 0.79
Lack of applicability of guidelines to my current practice 31 (9.1) 19 (9.60) 12 (8.39) 0.70
Lack of time 123 (36.3) 73 (36.9) 50 (35.0) 0.72
Organizational/Institutional 145 (42.8) 87 (43.9) 58 (40.6) 0.53
Insurance/financial reasons 43 (12.7) 22 (11.1) 22 (15.4) 0.25
Patient adherence/compliance 126 (37.2) 65 (32.8) 62 (43.4) 0.04*
Treatment-related adverse events 36 (10.6) 20 (10.1) 16 (11.2) 0.75
Other 21 (6.2)
 The results of poor patient health choices 1
 Relations between Cardiology and primary care providers 2
 Competence of Primary Care providers 2
 No changes to clinical practice Access/Availability of complex interventions/diagnostics 1
 Patient choice/autonomy 2
 Capacity in associated medical specialties 1
 Lack of evidence-based guidelines for complexity (e.g. AF in cancer care) 1
 DOAC reimbursement issues 1
 More specialized AF clinicians 1
 No barriers 7

AF, atrial fibrillation; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulants; GP, general practitioner; and POTS, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. *p < 0.05.