Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;61(12):1677–1695. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01160-z

Table 5.

Quality assessment of the 11 included studies using CCAT

Study no. Reference Preliminary Introduction Design Sampling Data collection Ethical matters Results Discussion Total Corresponding total percentage
1 [69] 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 34 85
2 [30] 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 38 95
3 [31] 5 5 4 5 5 3 5 4 36 90
4 [70] 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 39 98
5 [71] 5 5 5 4 4 2 4 4 33 83
6 [72] 3 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 34 85
7 [73] 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 37 93
8 [74] 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 32 80
9 [75] 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 36 90
10 [76] 5 4 3 3 5 2 5 4 31 78
11 [77] 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 38 95

The CCAT tool is based on a rating score on an overall scale of 0–5 (0, no evidence; 5, high evidence) in each of eight categories

CCAT Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool