Table 5.
Analysis of the hypotheses in the structural model proposed
| Path coeff (β) | Statistics t (β/STDEV) | f2 | Confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0% | 95.0% | ||||
| H1. Intensity of use Economic Sustainability | 0.133* | 1.78 | 0.11 | 0.042 | 0.249 |
| H2. Economic Sustainability Social Sustainability | 0.798*** | 33.422 | 1.748 | 0.758 | 0.837 |
| H3. Economic Sustainability Environmental Sustainability | 0.324*** | 3.972 | 0.15 | 0.188 | 0.459 |
| H4. Social Sustainability Environmental Sustainability | 0.456*** | 5.347 | 0.167 | 0.312 | 0.596 |
|
R2: Environmental Sustainability = 0.548; Economic Sustainability = 0.18; Social Sustainability = 0.636 Q2: Environmental Sustainability = 0.416; Economic Sustainability = 0.10; Social Sustainability = 0.407 | |||||
For n = 50,000 subsamples. Students in single queue *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001
Source: own elaboration