Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;84(4):877–918. doi: 10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7

Table 2.

Tobit estimates—the effect of green and digital technologies on regional emissions

(1) (2) (3)
Green Tech. (log) −1.026*** −0.989*** −0.957***
(0.092) (0.119) (0.119)
Digital Tech. (log) −0.146 1.007**
(0.253) (0.499)
Green × Digital Tech. (log) −0.297***
(0.094)
Population (log) 4.833*** 4.837*** 4.834***
(0.134) (0.134) (0.135)
Value added Manuf. (log) 1.873*** 1.871*** 1.840***
(0.214) (0.214) (0.214)
Dirty Units (log) 0.103** 0.103** 0.107**
(0.046) (0.046) (0.046)
Intermediate 0.767*** 0.762*** 0.768***
(0.220) (0.221) (0.220)
Rural 0.353 0.352 0.401
(0.253) (0.253) (0.254)
Pre-sample Mean GHG (log) 0.481*** 0.481*** 0.480***
(0.011) (0.011) (0.011)
Year Dummies Yes Yes Yes
# Observations 10,510 10,510 10,510
Log Likelihood −30,938.38 −30,938.26 −30,935.70
Wald Test 5829.67*** 5829.68*** 5835.37***

Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered at metroregion-level: ***, **, *, indicate significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively