Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6:1–11. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01280-2

Table 2.

Univariable analyses

Comparison of means IFDFWa mean p-value COSTb mean p-value
Full-time employment  < .001  < .001
 Yes 4.81 15.75
 No 3.66 11.19
Race/ethnicity .012 .15
 White non-Hispanic 4.49 13.95
 Black, Indigenous, or person of color 3.60 12.12
Student loan debt .012 .07
 Yes 3.97 12.95
 No 4.92 15.37
Credit card debt  < .001  < .001
 Yes 3.57 11.19
 No 6.55 20.98
Marital/partner status .02 .05
 Single 3.76 11.94
 Married/partnered 4.63 14.75
 All others 4.88 13.38
Recurrence, metastasis, second cancer .56 .70
 Yes 4.44 13.42
 No 4.24 13.88
Formal education  < .001  < .001
 Bachelor’s degree or higher 4.79 15.00
 Less than bachelor’s degree 2.93 9.68
Current annual income  < .001  < .001
 < $25,000 2.29 6.05
 $25,000–$49,999 3.29 11.12
 $50,000–$99,999 4.32 13.98
 $100,000 or more 6.24 19.25
Treatment status .36 .15
 Active treatment 3.80 11.21
 Receiving hormonal therapy 4.20 13.41
 Finished with all treatment 4.46 14.41
Did not pay some/all of out-of-pocket expenses  < .001  < .001
 Yes 2.68 9.10
 No 4.69 14.76
Took out a loan to pay medical bills  < .001  < .001
 Yes 2.16 6.31
 No 4.43 14.19
Receive family help with out-of-pocket costs .001  < .001
 Yes 3.42 9.58
 No 4.59 15.00
Paid for bills with a health savings account  < .001  < .001
 Yes 5.31 17.43
 No 3.92 12.35
Used crowdfunding to pay medical bills .013 .15
 Yes 2.87 10.92
 No 4.41 13.94
 Correlationsc IFDFW p-value COST p-value
 Age at diagnosis .05 .47 .04 .50
 Age now .14 .04 .15 .02
 Education .35  < .001 .25  < .001
 Income .43  < .001 .40  < .001

aInCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, scored 1 = 10 with lower scores indicating worse financial well-being

bComprehensive Scale for Financial Toxicity, scored 0–44 with lower scores indicating worse financial toxicity

cPearson r correlation