Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 5:1–16. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04017-7

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study characteristic Studies, n Study, %
Country 110 100
 United States 32 29
 United Kingdom 18 16
 Netherlands 8 7
 Germany 7 6
 Australia 5 5
 Othera 40 36
Year
 2011–2012 11 10
 2013–2014 20 18
 2015–2016 24 22
 2017–2018 23 21
 2019–2021 32 29
Study sample
 Female only 19 17
 Male only 0 0
 Allowed men to participate* 90 82
 Sex data not reported 1 1
Co-occurring physical health condition
 Yes 23 21
 No 87 79
Co-occurring mental health condition
 Yes 2 2
 No 108 98
Depression determination method
 Screening tool 29 26
 Clinical/diagnostic interview 25 23
 Both screening tool & clinical/diagnostic interview 56 51
Recruitment method
 Direct 74 67
 Indirect 14 13
 Both direct & indirect 22 20
Intervention type
 Psychotherapy 90 82
 Lifestyle 3 3
 Combined 6 6
 Not categorised b 11 10
Intervention style
 CBT & third wave 57 52
 All other types of psychotherapy intervention 22 20
 Physical activity 3 3
 Not categorised b 28 26
Mode of delivery
 Face-to-face Group 18 16
 Face-to-face Individual 54 49
 Online/tech/phone calls/printed materials 29 26
 Unclear/not reported 3 3
 Not categorised b 6 5
Contact
 Involved contact 95 86
 Self-guided with minimal contact 7 6
 Completely self-guided 4 4
 Not categorised b 4 4
Sessions per week
 < 1 23 30
 1 37 48
 > 1 17 22

a Spain (n = 4), Finland (n = 3), Denmark (n = 3), India (n = 3), Pakistan (n = 3), Brazil (n = 3), Iran (n = 3), Japan (n = 3), South Korea (n = 2), Nigeria (n = 2), Switzerland (n = 2), Turkey (n = 1), Korea (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), Hong Kong (n = 1), Italy (n = 1), New Zealand (n = 1), Sweden (n = 1), Kenya (n = 1), Taiwan (n = 1). b Study included > 1 intervention arm that differed on this characteristic (e.g., online vs. face to face). * Refers to studies which did not restrict eligibility to males or females