Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;35(10):7635–7658. doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-08058-8

Table 11.

Comparisons for Welded Beam (Best-so-far solution)

Algorithm  × 1  × 2  × 3  × 4 Objective
CSS [28] 0.20582 3.468109 9.038024 0.205723 1.724866
FA [67] 0.2015 3.562 9.0414 0.2057 1.73121
RO [68] 0.203687 3.528467 9.004233 0.207241 1.735344
MCSS [50] 0.20573 3.470489 9.036624 0.20573 1.724855
MOPM [74] 0.20573 3.470489 9.036624 0.20573 1.724852
ISA [75] 0.244330 6.219931 8.291521 0.244369 2.3812
GWO [76] 0.205676 3.478377 9.03681 0.205778 1.72624
TEO [79] 0.205681 3.472305 9.035133 0.205796 1.725284
SOA [80] 0.205408 3.472316 9.035208 0.201141 1.723485
PA [81] 0.02058 3.470495 9.036624 0.20573 1.724853
N2F [83] 0.20573 3.470489 9.036624 0.20573 1.724852
MPA [84] 0.205728 3.470509 9.036624 0.20573 1.724853
EO [85] 0.2057 3.4705 9.03664 0.2057 1.7549
SRO [86] 0.20573 3.470489 9.036624 0.20573 1.724852
CGWO [87] 0.20573 3.470499 9.036637 0.20573 1.724854
SMA [88] 0.2054 3.2589 9.0384 0.2058 1.69604
CGO [89] 0.198856 3.337244 9.191454 0.198858 1.670336
GTO [90] 0.20573 3.470489 9.036624 0.20573 1.724852
TLMPA [91] 0.20573 3.470489 9.036624 0.20573 1.724852
SBO [92] 0.175055 3.305377 9.248898 0.206137 1.699215
IGWO [93] 0.20573 3.47049 9.036624 0.20573 1.724853
CoSA [94] 0.205692 3.254453 9.03636 0.205733 1.695505
HS-WOA + [95] 0.20573 3.470489 9.036624 0.20573 1.724852
HS-WOA [95] 0.208079 3.442723 8.986502 0.208651 1.738146
AOS [96] 0.205730 3.470489 9.036624 0.205730 1.724852
LA [97] 0.2213 3.2818 8.7579 0.2216 1.8446
MGA [99] NA NA NA NA 1.672967
RSO [100] 0.205397 3.465789 9.034571 0.201097 1.722789
CPA [101] 0.188500 3.562000 9.134835 0.205245 1.723916
SCSO [102] 0.2057 3.2530 9.0366 0.2057 1.6952
AHO [103] NA NA NA NA 1.67
Proposed algorithm (PbA) 0.205715 3.470808 9.036624 0.20573 1.724872