Table 3.

Results of Latent Class Growth Analysis on the Five Identity Dimensions

							Trajectory Group Prevalence (%)
	AIC	BIC	SABIC	Entropy	LMR-LRT	BLRT	1	2	3	4	5	6
1 Class	10488.713	10588.686	10509.359	/	/	/	100
2 Class	9777.829	9921.791	9807.559	0.786	p < 0.001	< 0.001	46	54
3 Class	9539.072	9727.022	9577.887	0.784	p = 0.080	< 0.001	27	26	47
4 Class	9365.235	9597.174	9413.134	0.809	p = 0.173	< 0.001	35	27	29	9
5 Class	9240.253	9516.180	9297.236	0.809	p = 0.099	< 0.001	21	25	16	32	6
6 Class	9185.968	9505.883	9252.035	0.831	p = 0.049	< 0.001	5	38	9	23	3	22

AIC Akaike Information Criterion, BIC Bayesian Information Criterion, SABIC Sample size-adjusted BIC, LMR-LRT Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test, BLRT Bootstrapped Likelihood Ratio Test. The four class solution (in italics) was selected