Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;14(23):5021. doi: 10.3390/nu14235021

Table 2.

Dietary intake of micronutrients and diabetic retinopathy.

Study, Year
Study Design
Sample Size (n)
Quality
Score
Dietary Factor
and Its Association with DR
Adjustment/Matched Statistical Method Analysis Key Findings
Antioxidants
Carotenoids
Tanaka et al., 2013
Prospective
n = 978
10 Carotenoids
Protective
Sex, age, BMI, HbA1c,
diabetes duration, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycaemic agents without insulin treatment, systolic blood pressure, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, physical activity alcohol, smoking, total energy intake, proportions of dietary protein, fat, carbohydrate, saturated fatty acids, omega-6 PUFA and omega-3 PUFA and sodium
Multivariate Cox regression Highest intake
Q4 vs. lowest Intake Q1, HR: 0.52 (0.33–0.81) p < 0.01
Sahli et al., 2016
Cross-sectional
n = 1430
9 Lutein carotenoids
NS
Diabetes duration, HbA1c, blood pressure, race, total energy consumption, and study center Multivariable logistic regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1, OR: 0.89 (0.31–2.50), p = 0.72
Mayer-Davis et al., 1998
Cross-sectional
n = 387
9 Beta-Carotene
NS
Age, gender, ethnicity, diabetes duration, HbA1c, hypertension, caloric intake, and insulin use Multivariable logistic regression No significant
associations with
DR (data not
shown)
Zhang et al., 2019
Case–control
Type2 DM-86
control-40
8 Retinol carotenoids
Protective
Age, sex, smoking, BMI and alcohol consumption Logistic regression Intake of retinol (100 μg/day) on DR (OR: 0.88, 95%CI, 0.79–0.98, p = 0.025)
Sasaki et al., 2015
Cross-sectional
n = 379
8 Beta-carotene
NS
Intake of energy Data not shown No significant associations with
DR (data not shown)
Shalini et al., 2021
Cross-sectional
n = 495
7 Carotenoids
Protective
Nil One-way analysis of variance F test with a post hoc test of least significant difference The plasma concentration of carotenoids was significantly lower in the DR group compared to no DR patients and healthy controls (p < 0.001)
Vitamin C
Tanaka et al., 2013
Prospective
n = 978
10 Vitamin C
Protective
Sex, age, BMI, HbA1c,
diabetes duration, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycaemic agents without insulin treatment, systolic blood pressure, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, physical activity alcohol, smoking, total energy intake, proportions of dietary protein, fat, carbohydrate, saturated fatty acids, omega-6 PUFA and omega-3 PUFA and sodium
Multivariate Cox regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1,
HR: 0.61 (0.39–0.96), p = 0.03
Mayer-Davis et al., 1998
Cross-sectional
N = 387
9 Vitamin C
Risk
Age, gender, ethnicity, diabetes duration, HbA1c, hypertension, caloric intake, and insulin use Multivariable
logistic
regression
Intake 9th decile vs. 1st quintile,
OR: 2.21, (p = 0.01)
She et al., 2020
Cross-sectional
n = 455
8 Vitamin C
NS
Sex, race, insulin use, HbA1c, hypertension, exercise Binomial logistic regression multivariate analysis No significant association with DR (p = 0.413)
Sasaki et al., 2015
Cross-sectional
n = 379
8 Vitamin C
NS
Intake of energy Data notshown No significant association with DR (data not shown)
Millen et al., 2004
Cross-sectional
n = 1353
8 Vitamin C
NS
Race, BMI, diabetes duration, serum glucose, total energy intake, hypertension, waist–hip ratio, smoking, alcohol, drinking status, plasma cholesterol, hematocrit value, prevalent coronary heart disease, plasma triacylglycerol, diabetes treatment group, and oral hypoglycaemic treatment or insulin treatment Multivariable logistic regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1, OR: 1.4 (0.8–2.4),
p = 0.19
Vitamin E
Tanaka et al., 2013
Prospective
n = 978
10 Vitamin E
NS
Sex, age, BMI, HbA1c,
diabetes duration, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycaemic agents without insulin treatment, systolic blood pressure, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, physical activity alcohol, smoking, total energy intake, proportions of dietary protein, fat, carbohydrate, saturated fatty acids, omega-6 PUFA and omega-3 PUFA and sodium
Multivariate Cox regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1, HR: 0.84 (0.51–1.40), p = 0.51
Mayer-Davis et al., 1998
Cross-sectional
N = 387
9 Vitamin E
Risk (in non-insulin taking subjects)
Age, gender, ethnicity, diabetes duration, HbA1c, hypertension, caloric intake, and insulin use Multivariable logistic regression No association found in insulin subjects and in non-insulin
taking subjects: Intake 10th decile vs. 1st quintile, OR: 3.79, (p < 0.02)
She et al., 2020
Cross-sectional
n = 455
8 Vitamin E
Protective
Sex, race, insulin use, HbA1c, hypertension, exercise Binomial logistic regression multivariate analysis Intake in DR vs. No DR
(OR: 0.97, 95%CI: 0.95–1.00, p = 0.036)
Granado-Casas et al., 2018
Cross-sectional
n = 243
8 Vitamin E
Protective
Age, sex, educational level, smoking, physical activity, BMI, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes duration, HbA1c Multivariable conditional logistic regression models Intake of Vitamin E on DR
(OR: 0.85 [0.77–0.95], p = 0.006)
Sasaki et al., 2015
Cross-sectional
n = 379
8 Vitamin E
NS
Intake of energy Data notshown No significant associations with DR (data not shown)
Millen et al., 2004
Cross-sectional
n = 1353
8 Vitamin E
NS
Race, BMI, diabetes duration, serum glucose, total energy intake, hypertension, waist–hip ratio, smoking, alcohol, drinking status, plasma cholesterol, hematocrit value, prevalent coronary heart disease, plasma triacylglycerol, diabetes treatment group, and oral hypoglycaemic treatment or insulin treatment Multivariable logistic regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1, OR: 1.4 (0.8–2.3), p = 0.76
Selenium
She et al., 2020
Cross-sectional
n = 455
8 Selenium
Protective
Sex, race, insulin use, HbA1c, hypertension, exercise Binomial logistic regression multivariate analysis Intake in DR vs. No DR (OR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.96–1.00, p = 0.017)
Riboflavin
She et al., 2020
Cross-sectional
n = 455
8 Riboflavin
NS
Sex, race, insulin use, HbA1c, hypertension, exercise Binomial logistic regression multivariate analysis No significant association with DR (p > 0.05)
Vitamin D
Millen et al., 2016
Cross-sectional
n = 1305
9 Vitamin D
NS
Race, duration of diabetes,
HbA1c and, hypertension
Multivariable logistic regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1, OR: 1.20 (0.76–1.89), p trend = 0.740
Alcubierre et al., 2015
Case–control
Case:139 Ctrl:144
8 Vitamin D
NS
NIL Chi-squared No significant
associations with DR (p = 0.93)
Choline
Liu et al., 2021
Cross-sectional
n = 1272
9 Choline
Risk in female
Age, race, diabetes duration, glycaemic control, CVD, CKD * results analyzed in individual sex groups Multivariable logistic regression High intake vs. low intake (OR: 2.14, 95%CI: 1.38–3.31; p = 0.001)
Calcium
Chen et al., 2022
Cross-sectional
n = 5321
9 Calcium
Protective
Age, sex, race, smoking, serum glucose, serum laboratory data, hemoglobin Multivariable logistic regression High intake vs. low intake OR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.54–0.90, p = 0.05)
Alcubierre et al., 2015
Case–control
Case:139 Ctrl:144
8 Calcium
NS
NIL Chi-squared No significant
associations with DR (p = 0.65)
Potassium
Tanaka et al., 2013
Prospective
n = 978
10 Potassium
NS
Sex, age, BMI, HbA1c,
diabetes duration, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycaemic agents without insulin treatment, systolic blood pressure, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, physical activity alcohol, smoking, total energy intake, proportions of dietary protein, fat, carbohydrate, saturated fatty acids, omega-6 PUFA and omega-3 PUFA and sodium
Multivariate Cox regression No significant association with DR (p > 0.05)
Chen et al., 2022
Cross-sectional
n = 5321
9 Potassium
Protective
Age, sex, race, smoking serum glucose, serum laboratory data, hemoglobin Multivariable logistic regression High intake vs. low intake OR: 0.761, 95%CI: 0.59–0.97, p = 0.029
Sodium
Horikawa et al., 2021
Prospective
n = 912
10 Sodium
Risk (under low vegetable consumption)
Age, sex, BMI, HbA1c,
diabetes duration, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, log-transformed triglycerides, insulin treatment, smoking, alcohol, energy intake, physical activity, systolic blood pressure, angiotensin II receptor blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, calcium channel blocker
Multivariate Cox regression analyses Intake for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile vs. 1st quartile, HRs were 0.87 [95%CI, 0.31–2.41], 2.61 [1.00–6.83], and 3.70 [1.37–10.02], respectively
p = 0.010.
Horikawa et al., 2014
Prospective
n = 978
10 Sodium
NS
Sex, age, BMI, HbA1c,
duration of diabetes, LDL
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol,
log-transformed triglycerides, insulin treatment, lipid-lowering agents, smoking, alcohol intake, energy intake, sodium intake, and physical activity
Multivariate Cox regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1, HR: 1.10 (0.75–1.61), p = 0.55
Roy et al., 2010
Prospective
n = 469
10 Sodium
Risk (ForDME)
NS for DR
Age, sex, HbA1c, hypertension, total caloric intake, protein intake, oleic acid intake, physical exercise, and oleic acid intake Multivariable logistic regression Intake Q4 vs. Q1, OR: 1.43 (1.10–1.86), p = 0.008 for DME.
No significant
associations with DR
Cundiff et al., 2005
Prospective
n = 1412
8 Sodium
NS
Intake of energy Spearman correlation Sodium in mg/kcal against DR progression rate, r = 0.02 (p = 0.47)
Engelen et al., 2014
Cross-sectional
n = 1880
7 Sodium
NS
Sex, age, smoking, BMI,
urinary potassium excretion, sat fat intake, protein intake antihypertensive medication, total energy intake, physical activity, fiber intake, and alcohol intake
Multivariable logistic regression Per 1g/day increase in dietary salt intake against NPDR OR: 1.00, (0.96–1.04, p = 0.84.
PDR OR:
1.02 (0.95–1.08), p = 0.65
Vitamin B6
Horikawa et al., 2019
Prospective
n = 978
9 Vitamin B6
Protective
Age, sex, BMI, HbA1c, diabetes duration, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin treatment, oral hypoglycemic agents, antihypertensive agents, lipid-lowering agents, urine albumin creatinine ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, alcohol, smoking, energy intake, physical activity, retinol, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B9, vitamin B12 Multivariate Cox regression analyses Intake Q4 vs. Q1 HR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.30–0.85,
p = 0.010)

BMI—Body mass index, CI–Confidence interval, CVD—Cardiovascular disease, CKD—Chronic kidney disease, CI—Confidence interval, DR—Diabetic retinopathy, DME—diabetic macular edema, DM—Diabetes mellitus, HDL—High-density lipoprotein, HR—Hazard ratio, HbA1c—glycated hemoglobin, LDL—Low-density lipoprotein, NS—Not significant, NPDR—Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, OR—Odds ratio, PUFA—Polyunsaturated fatty acid, PDR—Proliferative diabetic retinopathy.