Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 4;19(23):16245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316245

Table 3.

Model Fit Indices, Models Comparison, and Summary of Invariance Tests Across Multigroup regarding compulsive buyer and not compulsive buyer.

χ2 df p χ2/df NFI TLI CFI RMSEA [90% CI] pclose p close AIC BCC ECVI MECVI
Multigroup model for the total sample 596.581 132 <0.001 4.52 0.92 0.84 0.95 0.053 [0.049, 0.068] 1 812.581 888.823 0.646 0.654
Unconstrained model 662.003 168 <0.001 3.94 0.92 0.82 0.95 0.046 [0.042, 0.057] 1 806.047 856.875 0.799 0.805
Measurement model 675.804 174 <0.001 3.88 0.91 0.82 0.95 0.046 [0.042, 0.057] 1 807.752 854.345 0.811 0.815
Structural model 690.605 186 <0.001 3.71 0.92 0.82 0.95 0.046 [0.042, 0.057] 1 798.585 836.705 0.845 0.888
Groups/Models ∆χ2 a df a p a ∆CFI a ∆χ2 b df b p b ∆CFI b
Measurement model 13.80 6 <0.001 <0.001
Structural model 14.80 12 <0.001 <0.001 1 6 <0.001 <0.001

Note. NFI = normed fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval; AIC = Akaike information criterion; BCC = Brown-Cudeck criterion; ECVI = expected cross-validation index; MECVI = modified expected cross-validation index. a Assuming unconstrained model to be correct. b Assuming measurement model to be correct.