Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 29;11(23):7075. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237075

Table 3.

Analysis of the rating of the psychometric properties, methodological quality and quality of evidence.

PROM Version Structural Validity (Rating) Internal Consistency (Rating) Reliability (Rating) Measurement Error (Rating) Hypotheses Testing (Rating) Responsiveness (Rating)
Bazi et al, 2013 [28] Arabic NR NE Sufficient NR NR NE
Methodological quality Risk of bias NR Inadequate Doubtful NR NR Inadequate
Quality of evidence NR Low Moderate NR NR Low
Doğan et al, 2016 [27] Turkish Indeterminate NE Sufficient NR NR NR
Methodological quality Risk of bias Doubtful Inadequate Doubtful NR NR NR
Quality of evidence NE Low Moderate NR NR NR
Peterson et al, 2019 [26] Brazilian Portuguese NR NE Sufficient NR NR NE
Methodological quality Risk of bias NR NE Adequate NR NR Inadequate
Quality of evidence NR NR Moderate NR NR Low
Liu et al, 2022 [29] Chinese NR NE Sufficient NR NR NR
Methodological quality Risk of bias NR NE Adequate NR NR NR
Quality of evidence NR NR Moderate NR NR NR

NR: not reported; NE: not evaluable.