Table 3.
PROM | Version | Structural Validity (Rating) | Internal Consistency (Rating) | Reliability (Rating) | Measurement Error (Rating) | Hypotheses Testing (Rating) | Responsiveness (Rating) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bazi et al, 2013 [28] | Arabic | NR | NE | Sufficient | NR | NR | NE |
Methodological quality Risk of bias | NR | Inadequate | Doubtful | NR | NR | Inadequate | |
Quality of evidence | NR | Low | Moderate | NR | NR | Low | |
Doğan et al, 2016 [27] | Turkish | Indeterminate | NE | Sufficient | NR | NR | NR |
Methodological quality Risk of bias | Doubtful | Inadequate | Doubtful | NR | NR | NR | |
Quality of evidence | NE | Low | Moderate | NR | NR | NR | |
Peterson et al, 2019 [26] | Brazilian Portuguese | NR | NE | Sufficient | NR | NR | NE |
Methodological quality Risk of bias | NR | NE | Adequate | NR | NR | Inadequate | |
Quality of evidence | NR | NR | Moderate | NR | NR | Low | |
Liu et al, 2022 [29] | Chinese | NR | NE | Sufficient | NR | NR | NR |
Methodological quality Risk of bias | NR | NE | Adequate | NR | NR | NR | |
Quality of evidence | NR | NR | Moderate | NR | NR | NR |
NR: not reported; NE: not evaluable.