Table 5.
Related work for BC studies with miRNA as biomarkers.
Reference | Function/Purpose | Methods | Accuracy of Model |
---|---|---|---|
[97] | Cancer Classification | Gradient Boosting | Accuracy 93.59% |
RF | Accuracy 93.24% | ||
LR | Accuracy 92.37% | ||
Passive Aggressive | Accuracy 88.31% | ||
SGD | Accuracy 90.35% | ||
SVM | Accuracy 91.54% | ||
Ridge | Accuracy 83.05% | ||
Bagging | Accuracy 91.1% | ||
[98] | Cancer Classification | NB | Accuracy 94.9% |
[99] | Cancer detection | RF | AUC 99.5–99.9% |
SVM | AUC 93.8–99.6% | ||
ANN | Accuracy 97.3% | ||
KNN | Accuracy 99.2% | ||
SVM | Accuracy 96.3% | ||
LR | Accuracy 95.8% | ||
[100] | Cancer Classification | Tree-based model | NIA |
[101] | Cancer Classification | DT | Accuracy 99.12% |
NB | Accuracy 93.86% | ||
ANN | Accuracy 100% | ||
DL | Accuracy 100% |
Abbreviations: BC: breast cancer; SVM: Support Vector Machine; LR: Logistic Regression; KNN: k-Nearest Neighbor; NB: Naïve Bayes; WBCD: Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnostic dataset; RF: Random Forest; SGD: Stochastic Gradient Descent; ANN: Artificial Neural Network; DT: Decision Tree; DL: Deep Learning; NIA: no information available.