Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 5;27(23):8574. doi: 10.3390/molecules27238574

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(A) The effect of contact time on Cu(II) sorbed amount by CS/PAN-g-St composite beads differing by St source and hydrolysis (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [106]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.) (B) Cu(II) removal performance by CS/PAN-g-St (from rice) composite cryobeads in successive sorption/desorption cycles (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [106]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (C) Effect of pH on selective removal of U(VI) by the sulfonate modified CS/Arabic gum biosorbent in the presence of competitive HMIs (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.) (D) Illustration with the cyclic Cu(II) sorption, CO2-mediated desorption, and regeneration of P(AA-co-DMAEMA)/CS aerogels (Reprinted with permission from ref. [108]). (E) Cu(II) sorption/CO2-mediated desorption performance of P(AA-co-DMAEMA)/CS aerogels (Reprinted with permission from ref. [108]).