Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;23(23):14707. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314707

Table 5.

The relative contents of the metabolites in rhizosphere soil were changed by humic acid on the decline diseased bayberry trees.

Metabolite Name Relative Content Metabolite Name Relative Content
Putrescine 2-Hydroxypyrazinyl-2-Propenoic Acid
LD 223.48 ± 12.81 LD 124.87 ± 3.48
HA 260.99 * ± 32.39 HA 145.17 * ± 14.46
Metharbital Alanine-Alanine
LD 6.03 ± 0.47 LD 132.12 ± 6.12
HA 7.70 * ± 1.26 HA 147.06 * ± 13.59
Lyxose Urea
D 0.42 ± 0.09 LD 170.82 ± 1.40
HA 9.97 * ± 5.43 HA 204.50 * ± 16.49
Glucose-1,2,3,4,5,6,6 Deuterated 2-Monoolein
LD 0.37 ± 0.03 LD 0.48 ± 0.06
HA 0.44 * ± 0.04 HA 7.94 * ± 4.22
1-Hexadecanol Beta-Sitosterol
LD 1.25 ± 0.16 LD 2.33 ± 0.08
HA 2.48 * ± 0.77 HA 4.07 * ± 1.16
Dehydroabietic Acid Glucoheptulose
LD 2.00 ± 0.21 LD 4.88 ± 0.37
HA 3.91 * ± 1.51 HA 6.49 * ± 0.50
Pentonolactone Guanidinosuccinate
LD 1.91 ± 0.03 LD 0.30 ± 0.13
HA 41.36 * ± 18.97 HA 3.58 * ± 2.17
Diclofenac Hydroxylamine
LD 4.61 ± 0.54 LD 22.48 ± 2.52
HA 7.05 * ± 0.79 HA 30.40 * ± 3.09
5-Methoxytryptamine Butylamine
LD 58.12 ± 10.05 LD 1.05 ± 0.02
HA 108.26 * ± 8.43 HA 1.29 * ± 0.10
Aconitic Acid Tbs Compound
LD 0.77 ± 0.11 LD 3.92 ± 0.18
HA 28.17 * ± 20.37 HA 4.44 * ± 0.46
Epicatechin Coniferin
LD 0.35 ± 0.05 LD 0.41 ± 0.09
HA 9.50 * ± 4.72 HA 0.70 * ± 0.19
Myo-Inositol Palatinitol
LD 51.82 ± 5.53 LD 12.43 ± 0.74
HA 27.57 # ± 5.15 HA 4.92 # ± 1.45
Hexitol Glucosamine
LD 4.61 ± 0.69 LD 1.02 ± 0.06
HA 1.76 # ± 0.55 HA 0.73 # ± 0.14
Benzoic Acid Tyrosine
LD 6.30 ± 0.94 LD 1.69 ± 0.32
HA 4.24 # ± 1.61 HA 0.86 # ± 0.19
Isohexonic Acid 2-Deoxytetronic acid
LD 5.88 ± 1.28 LD 2.02 ± 0.28
HA 2.51 # ± 0.41 HA 1.36 # ± 0.19
Isothreonic Acid Agmatine
LD 2.82 ± 0.64 LD 1.26 ± 0.20
HA 1.75 # ± 0.32 HA 0.68 # ± 0.25
Oxoproline Threonine
LD 41.30 ± 4.88 LD 1.23 ± 0.29
HA 23.33 # ± 9.17 HA 0.80 # ± 0.24
Proline Serine
LD 5.97 ± 2.37 LD 1.28 ± 0.39
HA 2.27 # ± 1.06 HA 0.66 # ± 0.25
Ribose Beta-Gentiobiose
LD 246.68 ± 38.36 LD 0.97 ± 0.43
HA 192.67 # ± 20.11 HA 0.48 # ± 0.06
Ribonic Acid Tagatose
LD 8.23 ± 2.78 LD 47.61 ± 22.07
HA 5.30 # ± 0.87 HA 20.05 # ± 8.06
Lactobionic Acid Conduritol-Beta-Expoxide
LD 15.30 ± 4.80 LD 2.05 ± 1.15
HA 7.40 # ± 1.69 HA 0.63 # ± 0.28
Glyceric Acid Hexadecylglycerol
LD 6.83 ± 1.18 LD 2.68 ± 0.13
HA 5.05 # ± 1.27 HA 1.60 # ± 0.50
Glucose Vanillic Acid
LD 13.14 ± 1.23 LD 1.81 ± 0.15
HA 7.62 # ± 1.76 HA 1.27 # ± 0.18
Chenodeoxycholic Acid Zymosterol
LD 0.44 ± 0.06 LD 8.71 ± 1.22
HA 0.24 # ± 0.08 HA 2.11 # ± 1.46
Deoxycholic Acid 2-Picolinic acid
LD 14.16 ± 2.26 LD 2.46 ± 0.35
HA 2.90 # ± 2.65 HA 1.42 # ± 0.41
Galacturonic Acid Butyrolactam
LD 1.13 ± 0.09 LD 3.09 ± 0.20
HA 0.74 # ± 0.27 HA 2.61 # ± 0.39
Glycerol N-Acetyl-D-Mannosamine
LD 160.69 ± 8.38 LD 0.90 ± 0.03
HA 132.88 # ± 26.61 HA 0.64 # ± 0.20
2-Ketoadipic Acid 4-Hydroxybutyric acid
LD 3.53 ± 0.12 LD 8.08 ± 0.47
HA 2.32 # ± 0.60 HA 4.04 # ± 2.28
Glutamate Erythronic Acid
LD 0.22 ± 0.04 LD 0.29 ± 0.03
HA 0.14 # ± 0.05 HA 0.24 # ± 0.04
Xylose Xylonolactone
LD 0.04 ± 0.03 LD 0.11 ± 0.09
HA 0.80 # ± 0.15 HA 0.86 # ± 0.14
Adipic Acid 6-Deoxyglucose
LD 1.04 ± 0.05 LD 13.40 ± 0.38
HA 0.76 # ± 0.19 HA 8.40 # ± 1.17
Fructose N-Acetylgalactosamine
LD 3.71 ± 0.15 LD 4.24 ± 0.23
HA 2.70 # ± 0.38 HA 2.21 # ± 0.77
2-Methylglyceric acid Carinitine
LD 1.00 ± 0.05 LD 5.33 ± 0.94
HA 0.69 # ± 0.13 HA 2.25 # ± 0.98
Inositol-4-Monophosphate 1-Monoolein
LD 2.13 ± 0.24 LD 1.91 ± 0.25
HA 1.18 # ± 0.31 HA 0.69 # ± 0.22
Maltotriose 2-Monopalmitin
LD 2.20 ± 0.31 LD 2.05 ± 0.06
HA 0.88 # ± 0.32 HA 1.50 # ± 0.22
Phytol 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid
LD 0.92 ± 0.13 LD 8.23 ± 1.48
HA 0.51 # ± 0.17 HA 4.53 # ± 1.11
2-Ketoglucose Dimethylacetal 3-Hydroxybutyric acid
LD 4.44 ± 1.15 LD 30.44 ± 9.12
HA 1.99 # ± 0.78 HA 13.47 # ± 7.17
Melezitose Glutamic Acid
LD 1.14 ± 0.22 LD 1.76 ± 0.24
HA 0.42 # ± 0.15 HA 0.93 # ± 0.21
Galactitol 1,5-Anhydroglucitol
LD 21.08 ± 3.78 LD 6.71 ± 3.06
HA 12.55 # ± 2.63 HA 2.11 # ± 0.23
1-Kestose Oleic Acid
LD 1.14 ± 0.22 LD 0.77 ± 0.18
HA 366.82 # ± 33.77 HA 0.51 # ± 0.12
Phenol
LD 23.03 ± 0.64
HA 26.95 * ± 3.18

LD and HA represent the absence and presence of humic acid in diseased bayberry trees, respectively. “*” and “#” represents significant (p < 0.05) increase and decrease compared to the control of the decline diseased trees, respectively.