Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15824. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315824

Table 4.

Difficulties in the use of pain-relief techniques according to the interviewed midwives in relation to their seniority.

Difficulties in Application of Pain-Relief Techniques Seniority p-Value
0–5 years 6–10 years 11–20 years ≥20 years
disagreement on the part of colleagues 38
(79.2%)
17
(73.9%)
19
(73.1%)
17
(44.7%)
0.0053 **
disapproval of the head nurse or the head of the department 38
(79.2%)
14
(60.9%)
13
(50.0%)
14
(36.8%)
0.0009 ***
lack of equipment, materials, and employees 30
(62.5%)
13
(56.5%)
8
(30.8%)
14
(36.8%)
0.0213 *
insufficient knowledge of the midwife 25
(52.1%)
10
(43.5%)
14
(53.8%)
12
(31.6%)
0.2055
lack of abilities 28
(58.3%)
9
(39.1%)
6
(23.1%)
10
(26.3%)
0.0050 **
concerns on the part of the woman giving birth 15
(31.3%)
11
(47.8%)
6
(23.1%)
14
(36.8%)
0.3035
lack of time 16
(33.3%)
8
(34.8%)
7
(26.9%)
14
(36.8%)
0.8701
The role of the accompanying person in the course of childbirth seniority (rS = −0.19; p = 0.0277 *) together
0–5 years 6–10 years 11–20 years ≥20 years
Low 2 (4.2%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (3.8%) 6 (15.8%) 9
average 7 (14.6%) 4 (17.4%) 7 (26.9%) 11 (28.9%) 29
Big 23 (47.9%) 5 (21.7%) 11 (42.3%) 11 (28.9%) 50
very big 16 (33.3%) 14 (60.9%) 7 (26.9%) 10 (26.3%) 47
together 48 23 26 38 135
Factors increasing the role of non-pharmacological factors in pain-relief measures seniority p-value
0–5 years 6–10 years 11–20 years ≥20 years
organization of workshops and courses 46
(95.8%)
22
(95.7%)
21
(80.8%)
29
(76.3%)
0.0203 *
improving the equipment of delivery rooms 37
(77.1%)
17
(73.9%)
10
(38.5%)
19
(50.0%)
0.0024 **
establishing better cooperation with the woman in labor 29
(60.4%)
11
(47.8%)
16
(61.5%)
21
(55.3%)
0.7330
increasing the number of staff 23
(47.9%)
13
(56.5%)
14
(53.8%)
21
(55.3%)
0.8759
better cooperation with the accompanying person 14
(29.2%)
6
(26.1%)
6
(23.1%)
7
(18.4%)
0.7088
team cooperation (especially with doctors) 3
(6.3%)
1
(4.3%)
0
(0.0%)
1
(2.6%)
0.5679

The p < 0.05 level was assumed as a statistically significant relationship (*); p < 0.01 is a highly significant relationship (**); p < 0.001 is a very highly statistically significant relationship (***).