Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 23;14(23):4962. doi: 10.3390/nu14234962

Table 5.

Results of univariate multiple logistic regression analysis for each model according to adjustment variables in the male and female groups. Each model used three factors contained by factor rotation as independent variables.

Groups Variables Unadjusted Model Model 1 a Model 2 b Model 3 c
Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Male
Group
Factor 1 0.650 (0.302–1.397) 3.945 (1.560–9.975) ** 3.367 (1.248–9.088) * 3.169 (1.175–8.551) *
Factor 2 0.490 (0.294–0.816) ** 3.470 (1.740–6.917) ** 2.783 (1.275–6.074) * 2.360 (1.038–5.369) *
Factor 3 0.661 (0.379~1.152) 0.750 (0.410–1.371) 0.700 (0.373–1.312) 0.692 (0.372–1.288)
Female
Group
Factor 1 0.278 (0.125–0.618) ** 4.096 (1.733–9.684) ** 2.395 (0.851–6.735) 2.456 (0.871–6.921)
Factor 2 0.371 (0.228–0.604) ** 6.874 (3.402–13.889) ** 5.278 (2.400–11.607) ** 5.074 (1.050–3.519) **
Factor 3 0.765 (0.435–1.343) 1.337 (0.766–2.332) 1.347 (0.703–2.580) 1.281 (0.667–2.460)

Abbreviations: Bolded items indicate a relationship between cataract prevalence and nutrient intake. (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). a Adjusted for age, education level, national basic livelihood, and marital status. b Adjusted for all the variables in Model 1, plus obesity, hypertension, diabetes, asthma, sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, hyperlipidemia, and heart failure. c Adjusted for all the variables in Model 2, plus physical activity, smoking, and drinking.