Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 3;12(23):4299. doi: 10.3390/nano12234299

Table 2.

Comparison of photocatalytic activity associated involving materials with relatively large internal surface area.

Organic
Photocatalyst
Experimental Conditions Light Source HER
(μmol h−1 g−1)
EQE
(%)
Ref.
SNP-BTT1 15 mg photocatalyst;
34 mL H2O, MeCN (1:1) at pH 7,
4 mL TEOA;
Pd 0.61 wt. %
Pt 3 wt. % (a)
300 W Xe,
>395 nm filter
3158 4.5
(at 420 nm)
[125]
Tr-F3N 10 mg photocatalyst;
50 mL H2O, ethylene glycol, TEOA (6:3:1);
Pd 6.9 ppm%
300 W Xe,
>300 nm filter
538 N.A. [126]
Cp-St 6 mg photocatalyst;
30 mL 1 M ascorbic acid at pH 4,
6 mL NMP;
Pd 0.739 wt. %,
Sn 0.293 wt. %
300 W Xe,
>420 nm filter
190,700 6.9
(at 550 nm)
[55]
S-CMP-3 25 mg photocatalyst;
25 mL H2O, MeOH, TEA (1:1:1);
Pd 0.72 wt. %
300 W Xe,
>420 nm filter
3106 13.2
(at 420 nm)
[37]
PTEPB 20 mg photocatalyst;
50 mL H2O;
Cu 0.02 wt. %
300 W Xe, >420 nm filter 218 10.3
(at 420 nm)
[13]
TFPT-COF 10 mg photocatalyst;
10 mL H2O, TEOA (9:1);
Pt 2.2 wt. % (a)
300 W Xe, >420 nm filter 1970 3.9
(at 500 nm)
[134]
FS-COF 5 mg photocatalyst;
25 mL 0.1 M ascorbic acid at pH 2.6;
5 μL of 8 wt. % H2PtCl6 added (a)
300 W Xe,
>420 nm filter
10,100 3.2
(at 420 nm)
[143]

(a) Pt wt. % value inferred in photodeposition. N.A.: Not Available.