Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 3;12(23):4299. doi: 10.3390/nano12234299

Table 3.

Comparison of photocatalytic activity associated involving materials with relatively large internal surface area.

Organic
Photocatalyst
Experimental Conditions Light Source HER
(μmol h−1 g−1)
EQE
(%)
Ref.
P10-e 325 μg photocatalyst;
25 mL aqueous [containing H2O and toluene (9:1), 10 mg mL−1 SDS and 3.5 mg mL−1 Na2CO3] MeOH, TEA (1:1:1)
Pd 0.403 wt. %
300 W Xe,
>420 nm filter
60,600 5.8
(at 420 nm)
[156]
PTB7-Th/
EH-IDTBR
2 mg photocatalyst
(30:70 PT7B-Th:EH-IDTBR and TEBS surfactant);
20 mL 0.2 M ascorbic acid (pH 2);
Pd 3129 ppm
Pt 10% (a)
300 W Xe, >350 nm filter 64,426 6.2
(at 700 nm)
[30]
PFODTBT/
PS-PEG-COOH
13 μg mL−1 photocatalyst;
3 mL 0.2 M ascorbic acid (pH 4);
Pd 0.1 w/w%
White LED light (17 W, 5000 K),
>420 nm filter
63,000 0.6
(at 550 nm)
[159]
D1,D2,ITIC/
PS-PEG- COOH
62 μg photocatalyst
(55 wt. % ITIC);
2 mL 0.8 M ascorbic acid (pH 4);
Pt 6 wt. % (b)
White LED light (17 W, 5000 K),
>420 nm filter
60,800 7.1
(at 600 nm)
[160]

(a) Pt deposition process not specified. (b) Pt wt. % value inferred in photodeposition.