Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 1;14(23):5115. doi: 10.3390/nu14235115

Table 11.

Environmental footprints of various protein sources.

Environmental
Footprints
Units of Measurement Red Meat Poultry FISH EGGS
Carbon
footprint
kg CO2-eq/kg
(food)
25.58/26.61 [212] a
5.77 [212] b
3.65 [212] 3.49 [212] 3.46 [212]
Water footprint
(total)
m3/ton (food) 8761/15415 [213] a
5988 [213] b
4325 [213] 1974 [214] 3265 [213]
Land
footprint
m2/kg (food) 308.58/542.82 [215] a
19.53 [215] b
19.22 [215] 0–10 [216] 17.83 [215]
CED e MJ/kg (food) 37–82 [217] a
25–31 [217] b
18–33 [217] No data 12–17 [217]
Use of
chemicals
Fertilizers
(N footprint
and
P footprint)
10 g N/serving 30.01/30.27 [6] a
56.68 [6] b
55.22 [6] 18.46 [6] 25.61 [6]
10 g P/serving 5.43/5.89 [6] a
9.75 [6] b
9.92 [6] 3.98 [6] 4.40 [6]
Pesticides / No data No data No data No data
Biodiversity footprint / f VERY
HIGH [218]
VERY
HIGH [218]
VERY
HIGH [110]
HIGH [110]
Environmental
footprints
Units of measurement Dairy
products
Legumes Nuts Cereal grains
Carbon
footprint
kg CO2-eq/kg
(food)
8.55/9.25 [212] c.
1.29 [212] d/2.59 [219] d
1.20 [212] 0.51 [212] 0.50 [212]
Water footprint
(total)
m3/ton (food) 5553/6760 [213] c
1020 [213] d/1485 [219] d
9063 [213] 4055 [213] 1644 [213]
Land
footprint
m2/kg (food) 60.27/65.20 [215] c
9.09 [215] d/12 [219] d
6.96 [215] 11.19 [215] 2.81 [215]
CED e MJ/kg (food) 38 [217] c
3.0–3.1 [217] d
2.9–7.4 [217] No data 1.7–9.6 [217]
Use of chemicals Fertilizers
(N footprint
and
P footprint)
10 g N/serving 15.18 [6] 0 [6] 4.28 [6] No data
10 g P/serving 3.79 [6] 0 [6] 0.63 [6] No data
Pesticides / No data No data No data No data
Biodiversity footprint / f high [110] low [110] high [110] intermediate [220] g

a Refers to beef; b refers to pork; c refers to cheese/butter (dairy products with higher fat content); d refers to milk/yogurt (dairy products with lower fat content); e ranges of data have been included for this footprint, because in the study from which they were extrapolated (a study that is among the most recent and authoritative), only specific foods were considered and not the food groups mentioned in this table; f VERY HIGH = strong negative impact; HIGH = moderate negative impact; INTERMEDIATE = neutral impact; LOW = positive impact. Scale made taking as reference specific table of the HCWH report “Redefining protein: adjusting diets to impact public health and conserve resources” [110]; g whole grains must be differentiated from refined ones, as the impact of the former is decidedly less.