Table 6.
Estimation results of model 2 with FQL as dependent variable.
| variables | Coef. | Odds Ratio | Standard error | Z-score | 95% Confidence Interval (OR) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRO | −0.13 | 0.88 | 0.17 | −0.65 | 0.61 | 1.29 |
| FC | −0.40 | 0.67 | 0.21 | −1.29 | 0.38 | 1.27 |
| NFM(ref:live alone) | ||||||
| 2–4 | −0.42 | 0.66 | 0.20 | −1.36 | 0.36 | 1.19 |
| 5–8 | −0.29 | 0.75 | 0.25 | −0.89 | 0.39 | 1.44 |
| more than 8 | −0.79 | 0.45 | 0.25 | −1.44 | 0.15 | 1.33 |
| RP | 0.39 | 1.47 | 0.40 | 1.43 | 0.86 | 2.49 |
| FPI | 0.70*** | 2.01 | 0.32 | 4.33 | 1.48 | 2.78 |
| LA | 1.05*** | 2.86 | 0.63 | 4.78 | 1.80 | 4.12 |
| LFA | 0.74*** | 2.10 | 0.35 | 4.50 | 1.51 | 2.89 |
| Log likelihood | −609.42 | LR Chi-square | 93.32 (p-value = 0.00) | |||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.07 | Brant tes | 14.02 (p-value = 0.14) | |||
Note: *, **, *** represents significant at the level of 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively.