Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 11;24(2):563–587. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00609-z

Table 2.

Effects of the earthquake on well-being, OLS estimation

Dependent variable: Happiness (1–5)a Full (1) Full (2) Rural (3) Rural (4) Urban (5) Urban (6)
Quakeb − 0.085*** (0.027) − 0.096*** (0.026) − 0.156*** (0.033) − 0.153*** (0.035) − 0.014 (0.028) − 0.023 (0.027)
Male − 0.034*** (0.009) − 0.040** (0.017) − 0.030** (0.013)
Age − 0.015*** (0.003) − 0.009*** (0.003) − 0.021*** (0.003)
Squared age/1000 0.180*** (0.031) 0.122*** (0.034) 0.244*** (0.034)
Han ethnicity − 0.110*** (0.031) − 0.126** (0.044) − 0.045 (0.030)
Middle school 0.163*** (0.015) 0.175*** (0.019) 0.147*** (0.028)
High school and above 0.310*** (0.019) 0.314*** (0.034) 0.300*** (0.031)
Urban 0.004 (0.017)
Year FE Y Y Y Y Y Y
Province FE Y Y Y Y Y Y
Adjusted R2 0.060 0.081 0.069 0.085 0.052 0.077
N1 3677 3677 1986 1986 1691 1691
N 32,205 32,205 17,047 17,047 15,158 15,158

aThe dependent variable is self-reported happiness (1–5); bQuake is 1 for Sichuan after 2008 and 0 otherwise. Major individual controls are included in columns (2), (4) and (6), and year and province fixed effects (FEs) are included in all the columns. N and N1 represent the sample size and number of observations from Sichuan province, respectively. OLS estimation is applied and standard errors, clustered at a province level, are shown in parentheses. *** significance at the 1% level, ** significance at the 5% level