Table 4.
Quality of the evidence-GRADE
| Outcome measures | Number of included studies | Aspect 1: limitations in risk of bias | Aspect 2: inconsistency | Aspect 3: indirectness | Aspect 4: imprecision | Aspect 5: publication bias | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BV/TV | 12 [35–52] | − 1a | 0 | − 1b | − 1c | 0 | Very low |
| BMD | 6 [37, 43, 44, 47, 50, 52] | − 1a | 0 | − 1b | − 1c | 0 | Very low |
| Tb.N | 4 [35, 39, 41, 46] | − 1a | 0 | − 1b | − 1c | 0 | Very low |
| Tb.Sp | 4 [39, 41, 46, 50] | − 1a | 0 | − 1b | − 1c | 0 | Very low |
| Tb.Th | 4 [39, 41, 46, 50] | − 1a | 0 | − 1b | − 1c | 0 | Very low |
aLack of randomization and blinding
bDifferences in animal models and interventions
cHigh heterogeneity