Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;13(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00998-2

Table 5.

Sentiment AUC comparison on binomial dataset

Algorithm Train–test split percentage 10-FCV
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
KNN 0.749 0.800 0.828 0.845 0.863 0.871 0.868 0.876
DT 0.579 0.579 0.610 0.604 0.619 0.601 0.625 0.604
SVM 0.793 0.847 0.878 0.897 0.917 0.913 0.929 0.932
NB 0.495 0.550 0.556 0.608 0.643 0.637 0.655 0.601
Voting 0.598 0.670 0.704 0.731 0.779 0.745 0.761 0.794
Bagging (KNN) 0.741 0.792 0.825 0.839 0.861 0.865 0.861 0.877
Bagging (DT) 0.618 0.637 0.641 0.624 0.652 0.651 0.647 0.638
Bagging (SVM) 0.795 0.849 0.879 0.898 0.918 0.917 0.929 0.934
Bagging (NB) 0.706 0.753 0.768 0.787 0.821 0.813 0.817 0.824