Table 2.

Prevalence of anti-Brucella IgG antibodies in the study districts.

District	Number of sample (N)	Borderline IgG positive (%)	95% CI	IgG positive (%)	95% CI
Balasore	28	0	–	2 (7.14)	1.24–24.95
Jajpur	14	1 (7.14)	0.68–34.12	1 (7.14)	0.68–34.12
Jharsuguda	53	3 (5.66)	1.61–16.25	5 (9.43)	3.52–21.42
Kalahandi	113	9 (7.96)	3.93–14.98	19 (16.81)	10.67–21.26
Kandhamal	139	14 (10.07)	5.82–16.62	31 (22.30)	15.86–30.30
Keonjhar	71	2 (2.81)	0.48–10.71	12 (16.90)	9.40–28.05
Mayurbhanj	45	2 (4.44)	0.99–15.60	2 (4.44)	0.99–15.60
Nabrangpur	210	11 (5.24)	2.77–9.42	26 (12.38)	8.39–17.79
Puri	22	1 (4.54)	0.67–22.43	4 (18.18)	5.99–41.00
Sambalpur	37	2 (5.40)	1.32–18.25	11 (29.73)	16.43–47.16
Sundargarh	85	9 (10.58)	5.25–19.61	23 (27.06)	18.25–37.96
Total	817	54 (6.61)	5.04–8.59	136 (16.65)	14.19–19.42