Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 30;7(3-4):87–98. doi: 10.1515/iss-2021-0001

Table 2:

Recent studies using near-infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) imaging for parathyroid glands (PGs) identification during thyroidectomy.

Author, year Study design Sample size Identified PGs, % Other main findings
McWade, 2014 [42] Case series 6 100% NIRAF showed 2.4–8.5 times higher emission intensity from the PGs than surrounding tissue.
McWade, 2016 [44] Clinical trial 137 97% BMI, disease state, vitamin D, and calcium levels account significantly for variability in signal intensity. Age, gender, PTH, and ethnicity had no effect.
De Leeuw, 2016 [4] Case series 35 98.8% PGs fluorescence was 2.93 ± 1.59 times greater than thyroid fluorescence in vivo.
Falco, 2016 [45] Case series 28 100% NIRAF allows high rates of PG identification and is a safe, feasible, and noninvasive method for real-time intraoperative identification of PGs. No postoperative hypocalcemia or other complications related to the surgery were registered.
Kim, 2016 [73] Case series 8 100% PGs that were exposed or even covered by connective tissues or blood vessels could be detected with strong emission.
Falco, 2017 [74] Case series 74 100% The number of PGs identified was significantly increased by the use of NIRAF. The differences in fluorescent intensity among PGs, thyroid glands, and background were not affected by age, sex, and histopathological diagnosis.
Ladurner, 2017 [75] Prospective trial 30 80.9% NIRAF can be used to distinguish PGs from other cervical tissues. There were no noticeable differences between parathyroid adenomas, hyperplasia, and normal PGs.
Kahramangil, 2017 [76] Clinical trial 22 98% Autofluorescence detects more frequently PGs before recognition with the naked eye compared to indocyanine green fluorescence.
No differences in postoperative hypocalcemia were detected.
Kahramangil, 2018 [52] Retrospective cohort 210 98% NIRAF facilitated PG identification before conventional recognition by the surgeon, 37–67% of the time. NIRAF alongside conventional visual cues to aid identification of PGs during neck operations.
Ladurner, 2018 [77] Case series 20 90.2% Neither lymph nodes nor thyroid revealed substantial autofluorescence and nor did adipose tissue NIRAF can be used to identify and preserve PGs during thyroidectomy.
Benmiloud, 2018 [78] Before and after controlled study 93 76.3% NIRAF reduced postoperative hypocalcemia and PGs autotransplantation rate.
Kim, 2018 [50] Prospective trial 38 92.8% NIRAF PG mapping has an excellent accuracy rate. This technique may be helpful for the early identification of PGs during thyroidectomy.
Alesina, 2018 [69] Prospective trial 5 68.8% NIRAF allows for enhanced visualization of the parathyroid tissue during video-assisted thyroidectomy with neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications.
DiMarco, 2019 [79] Prospective cohort 269 85.8% NIRAF doesn't reduce the incidence of missed inadvertent parathyroidectomy. There was no significant difference in serum calcium or PTH between NIRAF and control groups.
Dip, 2019 [80] Randomized controlled trial  170  NR (increased from a mean of 2.6–3.5) NIRAF increases intraoperative identification of PGs and decreases the incidence of postoperative hypocalcemia.
Benmiloud, 2019 [60] Randomized clinical trial 241 75.9% NIRAF increases parathyroid preservation after total thyroidectomy and helps to improve the early postoperative hypocalcemia rate significantly.

PGs, parathyroid glands; NIRAF, near-infrared autofluorescence; BMI, body mass index; PTH, parathyroid hormone; NR, not reported.