Table 5.
Recent studies on the management of asthma in preschoolers
Study | Design | Aim of study | Subjects | Age | Treatment arms | Main results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Castro-Rodriguez et al. [58] (2018) | Meta-analysis (6 RCTs included) | Compare the efficacy of daily ICS vs. daily oral LTRA | N=3,204 | 6–54 mo | Any kind of low-dose ICS (FP or BUD) vs. montelukast 4 mg QD, for a minimum of 3 mo | Daily ICS appears more effective than daily oral LTRA for symptom control and for decreasing exacerbations |
Preschoolers with asthma or recurrent wheezing who required controller therapy | Supportive of the recommendation of current guidelines: ICS as the preferred controller, LTRA as alternative | |||||
Fitzpatrick et al. [63] (2017) | R, DB, DD, CO | Individualized Therapy for Asthma in Toddlers study | N=300 (enrolled) | 12–59 mo | Assess the differential response to daily ICS (FP 44 μg BID) or intermittent ICS (as-needed FP 44 μg BID + albuterol) or daily LTRA (montelukast 4 mg QD) during 16 weeks of each therapy in a randomized order | Asthma control was most likely to be best during daily ICS therapy. |
N=230 (completed) | Daily low-dose ICS should be the first-line therapy in the subjects with aeroallergen sensitization and/or blood eosinophils ≥300/μL | |||||
Preschoolers with mild persistent asthma who required “step-2” asthma therapy | No predictors of best response to LTRA | |||||
Yoshihara et al. [60] (2018) | RCT, DB | The first large scale, RCT to assess the efficacy and safety of ICS/LABA in preschoolers | N=300 (enrolled) | 8–48 mo | FP/SAL 50/25 μg vs. FP 50 μg during 8-week DB period, after run-in period (FP 100–200 μg/day for ≥2 yr of age, 100 μg/day for <2 yr) | ICS/LABA did not show superior efficacy to ICS alone |
N=268 (completed) | No significant difference in safety was noted with ICS/LABA | |||||
Preschoolers diagnosed with asthma by Japanese guideline and for whom ICS/LABA was considered necessary by their physicians | ||||||
Kaiser et al. [48] (2016) | Meta-analysis (5 RCTs included) | Assess the efficacy of intermittent highdose ICS for the prevention of asthma exacerbation | N=422 | <72 mo | Any kind of high-dose ICS was initiated at the first signs of URTI (nebulized BUD 1mg BID for 7 days or MDI BUD 800 μg/1,600 μg BID for 7 days or nebulized BUD 400 μg QID for 3 days followed by 400 ug BID for 7 days or MDI FP 750 μg BID for 2 days until symptom free) | Reduce the overall risk of subsequent exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroid by 35% |
Preschoolers with severe intermittent asthma/ EVW (subgroup analysis) | Zeiger et al. [47] revealed no difference between daily low-dose ICS and intermittent high-dose ICS on asthma control and risk of exacerbation. |
RCT, randomized controlled trial; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LTRA, leukotriene receptor antagonist; FP, fluticasone propionate; BUD, budesonide; QD, quaque die; R, randomized; DB, double blind; DD, double dummy; CO, cross over; BID, bis in die; SAL, salmeterol; LABA, long-acting beta-2 agonist; EVW, episodic viral wheeze; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection; MDI, metered dose inhaler; QID, quarter in die.