Table 2.

Regression analyses modelling mean policy acceptability by participant characteristics.

		Coefficient	95% CIs	p-value
Age		−0.003	−0.006, −0.003	0.028
Gender (ref: Male)	Female	−0.02	−0.10, 0.07	0.685
	Other	−0.45	−1.37, 0.47	0.339
Education (ref: Lower)	Higher	0.03	−0.05, 0.12	0.455
Ethnicity (ref: Other)	White	0.02	−0.11, 0.15	0.750
Meat (any) consumption		−0.05	−0.07, -0.02	<0.001
Meat (red) consumption		−0.04	−0.06, −0.01	0.005
Intend to reduce meat consumption (any meat)		0.09	0.04, 0.13	<0.001
Intend to reduce meat consumption (red meat)		0.16	0.12, 0.20	<0.001
Importance of population health		−0.0009	−0.04, 0.04	0.963
Importance of protecting the environment		0.11	0.08, 0.15	<0.001
Belief that eating less meat is good for health		0.16	0. 11, 0.20	<0.001
Belief that eating less meat is good for environment		0.22	0.18, 0.26	<0.001
Trust in government		0.06	0.04, 0.09	<0.001
Constant		0.75	0.49, 1.01	<0.001

A p-value of <0.003 indicates significance.

N.B. 2097 observations (17 participants did not report ethnicity, 2 did not report gender (1 of whom did not report either ethnicity or gender), 103 did not answer the intentions to reduce meat question (of whom 3 did not report ethnicity)).