Skip to main content
. 2022 May 18;3:100040. doi: 10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100040

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Visual signals differentially modulate sound-evoked onset and sustained FR responses. (A) Example unit with visually modulated onset and sustained FR responses. Left: Spiking activity for auditory and audiovisual trials are shown in the top and bottom panels, respectively. Right: Differences in sound evoked FR responses between conditions (dots: single trials; boxes: mean ± SD). (B) Example unit for which only the sustained FR response was modulated by visual context. (C) Population summary of visually modulated sound onset and sustained FR responses. (1–2.) FR changes between condition for each unit by fractional depth. Outlined markers indicate significant visually modulated units (p < 0.05, FDR corrected). (3–4.) Summary of significant visually modulated sound onset and sustained responses in BS and NS units. Left: Percentages of visually modulated units. Right: Mean effect size (plus 99% confidence interval) for significant visually modulated units. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ns p > 0.05.