Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;83(1):1–36. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01803-2

Table 4.

Meta analyses of trials of tocilizumab and sarilumab in COVID-19

Study Benefit
Ref. Number of studies included Total number of patients Number of patients in Anti-IL6R group Survival benefit Progression to ICU admission Progression to invasive mechanical ventilation Place of corticosteroids Serious adverse events
[153] 23 6279 1897

Morality:

- All types of severity:–0.062 (- 0.118,–0.005)

- Severe patients:–0.119 (- 0.177,–0.06)

- All types of severity: 0.003 (-0.135, 0.141)

- Severe patients:0.096 (- 0.009, 0.200)

- All types of severity:–0.041 (- 0.145, 0.063)

- Severe patients:–0.108 (- 0.193,–0.024)

Not evaluated Not evaluated
[139] 27 10 930 6449

Day 28: OR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.79-0.95; P = 0.003

Absolute mortality

risk: 22% for IL-6 antagonists and 25% for usual care/placebo

- Tocilizumab: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.74-0.92; P < .001)

- Sarilumab: 1.08 (95%CI: 0.86-1.36; P = .52)

Not evaluated Not evaluated

Progression to IMV, ECMO or death (whole population):

- without CS: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79-1.17

- with CS: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.63-0.80

Progression to IMV, ECMO or death (Tocilizumab):

- without CS: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.76-1.20

- with CS: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0. 78

Progression to IMV, ECMO or death (Sarilumab):

- without CS: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.67-1.44

- with CS: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.67-1.75

28-days mortality:

- without CS: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.91-1.30

- with CS: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.88

Not evaluated
[142] 10 6493 3358

- Mortality: 24.4% vs. 29.0%; OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74–1.01; p = 0.07; I2 = 10%.

- Mortality in patients requiring ICU admission at enrollment: 34.7% vs. 39.6%; OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.65–1.10; p = 0.20; I2 = 24%

- Mortality in trials with low risk of bias: 12.3% vs. 10.7%; OR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.75–1.57; p = 0.65;

I2 = 0%.

- Sensitivity analysis using a fixed effect model: OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76–0.96;

p = 0.006; I2 = 10%; TSA adjusted CI: 0.70–1.04.

34.9% vs. 41.5%; OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.38–1.39; p = 0.34; I2 = 60%

- Progression to severe disease: 28.9% vs. 36.6% ; OR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59–0.89; p = 0.002; I2 = 26%

8.7% vs. 10.5%; OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54–0.89; p = 0.004;

I2 = 0%

Not evaluated Not evaluated
[150]†

36

RCT: 8, Cohorts: 28

6311 3267 - short term mortality: RR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.72, 1.07, I2 = 25%). “Poor outcome”: RR: 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.90, I2 = 3%) RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.93, I2 = 0%

Composite factor (mortality or mechanical ventilation):

- Receiving CS: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.79, 1.31

- Not receiving CS: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.89, 1.07

- SAE: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.63, 1.16

- Risk of infection: RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.99

[154] 9 6489 3358

- Fixed-effect model: OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.94; I2: 24%

- Random-effect model: OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.71–1.07

- Mortality for moderate disease:

* Global: OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.64–2.64; I2: 0%

*Fixed-effect model: OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75–0.94; I2: 53%

*Random-effect model: OR:

0.89; 95% CI: 0.71–1.18

Not evaluated Not evaluated Not evaluated Not evaluated
[155] 8 6481 3264

- Global population: RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96

- after exclusion of RECOVERY: RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06

- ICU patients: RR: 0.94, 95%CI 0.74-1.19 (I2=60%)

- Early mortality (14-15 days): RR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.01-4.69, I2=31%).

RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92, I2=6% RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.91, I2=0% Not evaluated

- AE: RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88-1.07,

I2=28%

- SAE: RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.72-1.06, I2=0%

- Superinfection: RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.64-0.97, I2=44%

- Severe superinfection: RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.35-0.93, I2=42%

- Neutropenia: RR: 8.70, 95% CI: 2.34-32.39

[156] 52 (9 RCT, 43 observational) 27004 among which RCT patients: 6604 8048 among which RCT patients: 3358

- Considering RCT: RR: 0.89,

95% CI: 0.82–0.96, 95%, PI: 0.80–0.97; I2 = 0.3%

- Considering observational studies: RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58–0.83, 95%, PI: 0.28

to 1.73 ; I2 = 84.0%

- Considering RCT: RR: 0.81, 95% CI:

0.71 to 0.93, 95%, PI: 0.60 to 1.09; I2=0.0%

- Considering observational studies: RR: 0.81, 95%, CI: 0.57 to 1.14, 95%, PI: 0.28

to 2.29 ; I2 = 70.2%

Composite endpoint of ICU admission or IMV:

- Considering RCT: RR: 0.80,

95% CI: 0.70 to 0.92, 95%, PI: 0.67 to 0.97; I2=0.0%

- Considering observational studies: RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.38, 95% PI: 0.67 to 1.73; I2 = 18.4%

- Considering RCT: RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.24; I2 = 64.6%

- Considering observational studies: RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.81; I2 = 59.9%

Not evaluated
[140]

10 (Sarilumab and Tocilizumab)

20 (Tocilizumab)

11 (Sarilumab)

6 (Klazakisumab)

2 (Olokizumab)

1 (Siltuximab)

1(Levilimab)

6428 -

Tocilizumab:

- D28: RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.97; I2 = 0.0%

- D≥60: RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.40; I2 = 0.0%

Sarilumab:

- D28: RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.36

- D≥60: RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.50 to 2.0

Progression Score of level of 7 or above: RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.74; I2 = 64.4%

Tocilizumab and clinical improvement : RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.13; I2 = 40.9%

- Not evaluated

Tocilizumab:

- AE: RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.72; I2 = 86.4%

- SAE: RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.06; I2 = 0.0%

Sarilumab:

- AE: RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.25

- SAE: RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.77

[114] 45 comparatives studies and 28 single-arm studies 13189 and 1770

3992

and “not appropriate"

Risk of mortality:

RR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.65 to 0.89, P < 0.01

Clinical improvement (comparative studies):

RR: 1.19 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.42; P = 0.05,

I2 = 81.2%)

ICU admission (comparative studies):

RR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.36 to 2.66; P = 0.99; I2 = 89.4%)

RR:0.48, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.97, p = 0.04 Not evaluated Secondary infections (comparative studies): RR: 1.24 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.56; P = 0.07; I2 = 66.5%)
[163] 13 2120 674 OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.69, P = 0.0005, I2 = 55% Not evaluated

OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.72, P= 0.88, I2

= 61%

Not evaluated Not evaluated
[143] 38: 3 double-blinded RCT, 4 open-label RCT, 23 prospective cohorts, 5 case-control studies 13 412 4090

Whole population: OR: 0.54, 95 % CI: 0.42–

0.71, p < 0.00001, I2 = 79 %

Subgroup analysis excluding observational studies: OR: 0.90, 95 % CI: 0.64–1.26, p = 0.54,

I2 = 0 %

Alteration of severity: OR: 1.05, 95 % CI: 0.92–1.20, p = 0.47, I2 = 84 % Not evaluated

- SAE: OR: 0.91, 95 % CI: 0.71–1.15, p = 0.42,

I2 = 46 %

[144] 6 2057 1177 HR: 0.83; 95% CI 0.66–1.05 Not evaluated

Composite endpoint of requirement of mechanical ventilation and all-cause mortality: OR:

0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91

Not evaluated Not evaluated
[146]

71 (including 6 RCT):

- Tocilizumab: 58

- Anakinra: 6

- Tocilizumab and Anakinra: 1

- Sarilumab and Tocilizumab: 1

- Sarilumab: 4

- Siltuximab: 1

22058

7328 (therapy under review)

6563 (Tocilizumab)

Tocilizumab:

- Global: RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.96, I2=0.0%

-Prospective studies: HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.44 to

1.10, I2=0%

-Retrospective studies: HR: 0.52, 95% CI:

0.41 to 0.66, I2=76.6%

-RCT alone: RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.01

I2=0.0%)

Sarilumab: aOR:

2.01, 95% CI: 1.18 to 4.71

Outcomes on the Ordinal scale:

* Tocilizumab:

- Prospective studies: GenOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.19, I2=84.3%

- Retrospective studies: GenOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.64, I2=98%.

* Sarilumab:

GenOR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.27

Not evaluated “similar”
[145] 6 1038 -

RR: 1.03;

95% CI: 0.72 to 1.46; p = 0.89, I2 = 0.0%

- Random-effect: RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.38; p = 0.32, I2 = 36%

- Random-effect: RR: 0.70;

95% CI: 0.51 to 0.96; p = 0.02, I2 =0%

Not evaluated

SAE:

- Random-effect: RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.14; p = 0.12, I2 = 57.9%

- Fixed-effect: RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.81; p = 0.00, I2 = 77.4%

[152] 9 6778 3647

- Meta analysis:

* Studies mortality rate: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.18 – 0.2, I2: 98.8%

Not evaluated Not evaluated Not evaluated Not evaluated
[157] 26: 23 retrospectives, 1 prospective, 2 randomized controlled 8272 2112 RR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.37 – 2.00, I2: 70% Not evaluated Not evaluated Not evaluated Not evaluated
[147] 8 6314 3267 D28: OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.66–1.28; I2 = 62% D28: OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28–0.92; I2 = 30% Incidence of mechanical ventilation à D28: OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.62–0.90; I2 = 11% Steroids at admission: OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.56–1.43; I2 = 81%

- AE: OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.71–1.49; I2 = 43%

- SAE: OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.67–1.12; I2 = 0%

- Infection: OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.63–1.20; I2 = 0

[148] 29 11 487 2651 RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59–0.93; P = 0.008; I2 = 80% RR: 1.40, 95% CI : 0.64–3.06 ; P = 0.4; I2 = 88%

RR: 0.83 95% CI: 0.57–1.22; P = 0.34;

I2 = 65%

Secondary infection: RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.97–1.74; P = 0.08; I2 = 65%
[158] 25 10 201 4056 OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54–0.90, P = 0.007; I2: 74% Not evaluated

OR: 0.59,

95% CI: 0.37–0.93, P = 0.02; I2: 56%

Not evaluated Not evaluated
[151] 9 6490 3358

RR: 0.89,

95% CI: 0.80–0.98, p = 0.02; I2: 6%

Not evaluated RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71–0.89, p < 0.0001; I2: 0% RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.95, p = 0.0009; I2: 0% Not evaluated
[141]

18

- Tocilizumab: 16

- Sarilumab: 1

- Siltuximab: 1

RCT: 1, Cohort: 14, case control : 3

3303 - Tocilizumab or Sarilumab: RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49–0.76; I2: 58% Not evaluated RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.32–1.45; I2: 75% Not evaluated Not evaluated
[159] 17‡ 14 054 Not evaluated “Treatment failure”: RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42 – 0.91; I2: 60%

Mortality in SOC vs Tocilizumab and corticosteroid therapy:

RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42 – 0.91; I2: 60%

RR: 1.11, 95%

CI: 0.81 – 1.53, I2 was 0%, ( p = 0.84)

[164] 39 15 531 3657

OR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55–1.01, p = 0.057, I2: 79.5%

Studies with adjusted, estimated, Tocilizumab: HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38–0.64, p < 0.001

OR: 3.79, 95% CI:

0.38–37.34, p = 0.254

Studies with adjusted, estimated, Tocilizumab: OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06–0.43, p < 0.001

OR: 2.21 95% CI: 0.53–9.23, p = 0.277, I2: 86.57% OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36–0.65, p < 0.05

OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.01–5.54,

p = 0.050, I2: 87.96%

[165] 64: controlled observational studies: 54, RCT: 10 20 616 7668

- Broad mortality: OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.93, I2 = 82%, (p < 0.001)

- Patients receiving CS: OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54–0.84

- In wards: OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.74–2.18, I2: 82.9%

- In ICU: OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.59–0.76, I2: 0.00%

- Tocilizumab before D10: OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.35–1.42

- Tocilizumab after D10: OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.48–1.45

Not evaluated Not evaluated Not evaluated Secondary infection: OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.72–1.52, I2: 87.8%
[149] 6 5426 2849 RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.07, I2=0% Not evaluated Not evaluated separately Not evaluated SAE : RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.10, I2=0
[160]#

All experimental treatments: 222

Tocilizumab: 12

All experimental treatments: 102 950

Tocilizumab: 13606

-

- Fixed-effect model: OR: 0.85, 95% CrI: 0.77–0.95

- Random-effect model: OR of 0.91, 95% CrI: 0.74 -1.16

Not evaluated

OR: 0.75, 95%

CrI: 0.65–0.86

Not evaluated Not evaluated
[161]* 15 (including 7 unpublished) 5339 1661

- Oxygen only: median OR: 0.70 (95%

CrI, 0.50-0.91). PPBA: 98.9%. PPMCA: 95.5%

- NIV: median OR: 0.81 (95%CrI, 0.63-1.03).

PPBA: 95.5%

PPMCA: 82.2%

- IMV: median OR: 0.89 (95%CrI, 0.61-1.22)

PPBA: 75.4%

PPMCA: 52.9%

Not evaluated Not evaluated All included patients have received corticosteroids Not evaluated
[162] 9 6490 3358

OR: 0.87; 95%

CI: 0.73-1.04; I2: 15%

Non severe disease:

OR: 0.1.3; 95%

CI: 0.77-2.20; I2: 0%

Severe disease:

OR: 0.84; 95%

CI: 0.63-1.12; I2: 57%

OR: 0.66; 95% CI : 0.40-1.08; I2: 29% OR : 0.74; 95% CI: 0.64-0.86; I2: 0%

Initial use of steroids in more than 50% of participants:

OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.66-1.13; I2: 46%

Initial use of steroids in more than 50% of participants:

OR: 1.07 ; 95% CI : 0.0.70-1.64; I2: 0%

- One AE: OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.87-2.19; I2: 70%

- Serious AE: OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70-1.14; I2: 0%

- Infection: OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.65-1.23; I2: 0%

- Serious infection: OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36-0.89 ; I2: 21%

AE Adverse event, CS corticosteroids, ECMO extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, IL-6R Receptor of interleukin-6, IMV invasive mechanical ventilation, NIV Noninvasive ventilation, NS not significant, PI prediction interval, PPBA Posterior probability of benefit association, PPMCA Posterior probability of meaningful clinical association, RCT Randomized and controlled trial, AE adverse events, SAE Severe adverse events, SOC standard of care

Presented results include only the analysis of RCT.

Corticosteroids: Methylprednisolone

# Bayesian meta-analysis

* Bayesian reanalysis of previous meta-analysis (33)

Positive results are indicated in bold