Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov-Dec;55(6):353–358. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0043

Table 3.

Participant responses on items regarding T staging.

T-staging item Radiologists (N = 56) n (%) Referring physicians (N = 50) n (%) P -value*
Primary tumor measurement
One axis 10 (18) 9 (18)
Two axes 24 (43) 22 (44) 1.000
Three axes 22 (39) 19 (38)
Contact with adjacent viscera
There is/isn’t a cleavage plane between the tumor and the anatomical structure 19 (34) 33 (66)
There is/isn’t a clear fatty plane between the tumor and the anatomical structure 7 (12) 1 (2) 0.038
There is close contact between the lesion and the structure, without unequivocal signs of anatomical invasion 30 (54) 16 (32)
Contact with vascular structures < 0.001
Gives only a brief description: “Tumor extension to vessel _______ ” 35 (64) 47 (94) 0.377
Details circumferential involvement of the artery (e.g., “< 180°”) 50 (91) 42 (85) 0.081
Details the presence or absence of stenosis and alteration in vessel diameter 54 (96) 44 (88) 0.002
Details the presence or absence of vascular wall irregularities 43 (78) 24 (47) 0.768
Details the presence/absence of fow in the vessel 49 (89) 44 (88)

* Fisher’s exact test.