Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov-Dec;55(6):353–358. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0043

Table 4.

Participant responses on items regarding N staging.

N-staging item Radiologists (N = 56) n (%) Referring physicians (N = 50) n (%) P -value*
Regional lymph nodes
Measurement
Major axis 5 (9) 10 (20)
Minor axis 20 (36) 16 (32) 0.051
Two axes 30 (54) 17 (34)
Three axes 1 (2) 7 (14)
Numerical reporting
Exact number 5 (9) 25 (50) < 0.001
General idea of number (e.g., “few”, “multiple”) 45 (80) 24 (48)
No mention of number 6 (11) 1 (2)
Imaging descriptors
Extracapsular rupture 33 (60) 46 (92) < 0.001
Central density/signal changes (inferring necrosis) 53 (96) 43 (86) 0.082
Lymph node morphology (e.g., round, lobulated, or unusual) 52 (93) 39 (78) 0.056
Measurement 55 (98) 50 (100) 1.000
Precise anatomical terminology on lymph node chains 53 (96) 47 (94) 0.667

* Fisher’s exact test.