Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;12(12):e066389. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066389

Table 3.

Sobel-Goodman mediation analyses

Total mediation Subjective financial situation Loneliness
Panel A: mental distress (GHQ-12)
Employment relationships (ref.=Gig workers)
Full-time employed
 Indirect effect −0.55 (0.21)** −0.23 (0.05)*** −0.32 (0.09)***
 Percent mediated 67.75% 28.43% 39.32%
Part-time employed
 Indirect effect −0.41 (0.21)* −0.16 (0.05)** −0.26 (0.09)**
 Percent mediated 55.71% 21.08% 34.63%
Unemployed
 Indirect effect 0.45 (0.21)* 0.24 (0.06)*** 0.21 (0.12)
 Percent mediated 64.21% 34.37% NA
Panel B: life satisfaction
Employment relationships (ref.=Gig workers)
Full-time employed
 Indirect effect 0.29 (0.10)** 0.15 (0.03)*** 0.14 (0.04)***
 Percent mediated 97.79% 52.84% 44.95%
Part-time employed
 Indirect effect 0.21 (0.10)* 0.10 (0.03)*** 0.10 (0.03)***
 Percent mediated 60.96% 30.32% 30.64%
Unemployed
 Indirect effect −0.25 (0.10)* −0.17 (0.04)*** −0.08 (0.05)
 Percent mediated 62.42% 40.67% NA

Robust SEs in parentheses.

*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

GHQ-12, General Health Questionnaire; NA, not available.