Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;16(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13065-022-00905-y

Table 3.

Comparison of the analytical performance of the proposed sensor for the simultaneous determination of RC and HQ with other electrochemical sensors found in the literature

Electrode (specificity) Technique (specificity) pH Linearity and Range (µM) LOD (µM) Refs.
HQ RC HQ RC
MWCNT–SH@Au–GR/GCE a DPV 7 54.5–1250.5 43.5–778.5 4.17 7.80 [3]
P-rGO b DPV 7 5–90 5–90 0.08 2.62 [30]
Nafion/MWCNTs/CDs/MWCNTs c DPV 7 1–200 1–400 0.07 0.15 [7]
MEA-MWCNTs d Amperometry 5.40 1–100 6–100 0.3 0.6 [3]
PANI/MnO2 ME e DPV 7 0.2–100 0.2–100 0.13 0.09 [5]
Graphene doped CILE f DPV 5 10–400 1–170 1.8 0.4 [6]
ZnFe2O4/NPs/IL/CPE SWV 6 50–700 3.0-500 23.5 1.46 Current work

aGold nanoparticle–graphene nanohybrid bridged 3-amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole-functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes

b Porous reduced graphene oxide

c Nafion/multi-walled carbon nanotubes/carbon dots/multi-walled carbon nanotubes

d multielectrode array modified with multiwall carbon nanotubes

e Polyaniline (PANI) nanofibers / MnO2 modified electrode

f Graphene Doped Carbon Ionic Liquid Electrode